FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288  
289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   >>   >|  
in favorable localities, or are massive in construction, that are left for our inspection. But these nearly obliterated records of the past are of more than passing interest to us as monuments of the prehistoric times of our own country. We wander over these ruins and find much to interest us, much to excite our curiosity. The purposes of many are utterly unknown. Some, by their great proportions, awaken in us feelings of admiration for the perseverance and energy of their builders. But when we investigate the objects of stone, of clay, and of copper this people left behind them, we notice how hard it is to draw a dividing line between them and the Indians. In fact, there is no good reason for separating them from the Indian race as a whole. We do not mean to say that they were not, in many respects, different from the tribes found in the same section of the country by the early explorers, though, we ought, perhaps, to confine this remark to the central portion of the country occupied by these ancient remains. But the American of to-day differs from the American of early Colonial times. The miserable natives of Southern California were Indians, but very different indeed from the ambitious, warlike Iroquois, who displayed so much statesmanship in the formation of their celebrated league. In another chapter we shall discuss this part of our subject, as well as the question of the antiquity of the ruins. REFERENCES (1) The manuscript of this chapter was submitted to Prof. F. W. Putnam, curator of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, for criticism. (2) Conant's "Footprints of Vanished Races," p. 122. (3) Force: "Some Considerations on the Mound Builders," p. 64; "Am. Antiquarian," March, 1884, pp. 93-4; "10th Annual Report, Peabody Museum," p. 11. (4) Short's "North Americans of Antiquity", p. 28. (5) Squier and Davis's "Ancient Monuments," p. 105. (6) Foster's "Prehistoric Paces," p. 148. (7) Squier's "Aboriginal Monuments of New York," Smithsonia Contribution No. 11, p. 83. (8) Squier's "Aboriginal Monuments of New York," Smithsonia Contribution No. 11, p. 87. (9) Foster's "Prehistoric Races," p. 121. (10) "They are numbered by millions." Ibid. (11) Prof. Forshey could frame no satisfactory hypothesis of their origin. Ibid, p. 122. (12) "Native Races," Vol. IV, pp. 739 and 740. (1
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288  
289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

country

 

Monuments

 

Squier

 
Prehistoric
 

Smithsonia

 

Aboriginal

 

Indians

 

Foster

 

Contribution

 
Museum

Peabody

 
chapter
 
American
 

interest

 
Builders
 

Considerations

 

Antiquarian

 

Annual

 
Report
 
monuments

Putnam

 
curator
 

submitted

 

wander

 
manuscript
 

Archaeology

 

Ethnology

 
prehistoric
 

Footprints

 

Vanished


Conant

 

Harvard

 

University

 

criticism

 

passing

 

Americans

 

numbered

 

millions

 

favorable

 

Forshey


Native

 

satisfactory

 
hypothesis
 

origin

 

records

 

Ancient

 

obliterated

 
REFERENCES
 

Antiquity

 

construction