h altar in the presbytery above.
[76] A third font (modern) formerly stood in the north-west tower.
[77] It is curious that the same story should be told of Roger de
Mowbray, founder of Byland Abbey in this same county. (_Murray's
Cathedrals._)
[78] Another suggestion is that the subject has some connection with the
history of the Disobedient Prophet.
[79] _Surtees Soc._, vol. lxiv. p. 92.
[80] But for the label, these arms resemble those of John of Eltham
(brother of Edward III.), who died without issue in 1334.
[81] It is pleasant to find in the church several indications of aid
received from the other great ecclesiastical foundation in the
neighbourhood.
[82] Taken by itself, the coarseness of the work in the tower and
transept would suggest that these parts were later, and not earlier,
than the nave. But (not to mention documentary evidence), if they were
later, then the Rood Screen must be later also, which can hardly be the
case, the stalls against it being dated 1489.
[83] Probably (as Walbran suggested) with money subscribed for the
tower, the completion of which was perhaps the less pressing necessity.
[84] In the large mediaeval churches there was usually an altar at the
east end of the nave.
[85] It may have been put here at the time of the building of the
present nave, than which it is perhaps slightly earlier.
[86] The Markenfields were one of the principal families in the
neighbourhood from the fourteenth century onwards, until in the reign of
Elizabeth they ruined themselves by taking part in the Rising in the
North. Their ancient moated Manor-house, in which both the knights
sculptured on these altar tombs must have lived, is still standing,
about three miles from Ripon, towards Harrogate.
[87] This aisle was also the site of the chantry of St. Andrew.
[88] In these pages this term is used to describe round mouldings which
are brought to an edge without actually having a fillet upon them.
[89] By Mr. Francis Bond.
[90] In spite of Sir G. Scott's conjectural plan. (See p. 67.)
[91] It is possible that the screen there mentioned may be the present
structure, or may have been incorporated into it. In 1408 the accident
to the tower had not yet occurred, and the piers that now flank the
screen had therefore not yet been built. There is a not very credible
story that the present screen came from Fountains Abbey.
[92] This peculiarity is found at some other places--_e.g._, S
|