FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81  
82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>  
t the state) have thought it of a nature not at all requiring their interference What can be so preposterous? So monstrous? And in taking leave of this view of the case, let me once more ask you who have been actually the publishers of this paper? Have you a single iota of evidence, which ought to satisfy your minds, that, but for the insidious conduct of the Association, and its spies, this pamphlet would ever have been before you or the public? Is there a shadow of proof that one copy was ever sold, except those bought by the creatures employed by the honorary secretary (who is also the feed attorney in this prosecution) for the sole object of entangling the defendant in this indictment? None, whatever. None. They conspired you see to procure and seduce (the word is neither too broad nor too long for their conduct) the publication for the very purpose of this prosecution. How then having thus suborned the offence of which they complain, can they dare to stand forward as prosecutors, when they themselves are the criminals, and ought to be the defendants. Mr. Justice BEST.--You mean. Mr. Cooper, to offer some evidence of that, I suppose. Mr. COOPER.--None, my lord, but the evidence already before the court and the jury, and the strong and necessary inference from the facts proved by the witnesses for the prosecution themselves. Mr. GURNEY.--There were many others lying on the counter. Mr. COOPER.--What of that, does it follow that they must, therefore, have been sold? In the absence of all other proof of any publication, I have a right, I am forced to consider the Association as the only publishers. Mr. Justice BEST.--In the evidence there is nothing like it. Mr. COOPER.--What, gentlemen, is it a necessary conclusion, that because the pamphlets were lying in the shop, they must have been sold to other persons? The defendant but for their intrusion, for the sole design of prosecution, might have sold no others. She might have changed her intention to sell. The pamphlets might have lain like bad verses untouched on the shop counter, till they were turned over for waste paper, and not a soul have ever known of their contents. The Association, therefore, by their insidious and plotted purchase for the sole object of prosecution, have provoked the act of publication, and they, who provoke crimes are the criminals, and ought to be the culprits; and those, who would punish the crimes that they have prov
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81  
82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>  



Top keywords:

prosecution

 
evidence
 

Association

 

COOPER

 

publication

 

Justice

 

criminals

 

pamphlets

 

counter

 

object


defendant

 

crimes

 

insidious

 

publishers

 

conduct

 

strong

 

purchase

 

inference

 

plotted

 

contents


GURNEY

 

witnesses

 

proved

 

culprits

 

punish

 

provoke

 

suppose

 

provoked

 

turned

 

changed


forced

 

Cooper

 
intrusion
 
conclusion
 

gentlemen

 

design

 

follow

 

persons

 

untouched

 

verses


absence

 

intention

 

satisfy

 

single

 

shadow

 

public

 

pamphlet

 

requiring

 

interference

 
nature