FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  
rded the sitting fairly well, but the experiment was not repeated--why, I do not know, for the intonations of the controls would have been an interesting study. I have often used expressions of affirmation in this chapter, and the reader might therefore conclude that the existence of spirits is no longer a hypothesis in my eyes, but a reality. I have already warned him, and warn him again, that I speak thus only for convenience' sake, and that the existence of spirits is still as hypothetical to me as to anyone else. FOOTNOTES: [52] Not the real name. _See_ p. 78, _Trans._ [53] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xiii. p. 291. [54] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xiii. p. 294. CHAPTER X How George Pelham has proved his identity--He recognises his friends and alludes to their opinions--He recognises objects which have belonged to him--Asks that certain things should be done for him--Very rarely makes an erroneous statement. Some of my readers must have asked themselves what the returning George Pelham can have said to make grave and intelligent men think he has proved his identity. I shall try to give them some idea by relating such incidents as I can report without entering into too slight or complete details. I cannot relate everything, in the first place for want of space, and secondly, because I should be tiresome--a thing to be avoided in a popular work like the present. When Dr Hodgson wrote the report which appeared in 1898, George Pelham, who, like Phinuit, is always ready to act as intermediary (though employing writing instead of speech) had had occasion to see one hundred and fifty sitters, among whom thirty were old friends of his. He recognised the whole thirty, and never mistook a stranger for a friend. He not only addressed them all by name but took with each of them the tone he had been accustomed to take. We do not speak in the same way to all our friends. The tone of our conversation differs according to the character and the age of the person we address, and according to the degree of esteem or affection we have for him. These shades of manner are typical, though instinctive, and therefore are difficult to reproduce artificially. George Pelham, then, addressed the thirty friends whom he had the opportunity of meeting through the medium in the tone which he was in the habit of taking formerly with each one of them. The incidents I shall quote are only examples; I have said why I cannot reca
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
friends
 

George

 

Pelham

 

thirty

 

proved

 

incidents

 

identity

 

addressed

 

recognises

 

report


spirits
 

existence

 
hundred
 

stranger

 

occasion

 

mistook

 

sitters

 

intonations

 

controls

 

recognised


present

 
Hodgson
 

interesting

 

tiresome

 
avoided
 

popular

 

appeared

 
intermediary
 

employing

 

writing


friend

 

Phinuit

 

speech

 

repeated

 

difficult

 

reproduce

 

artificially

 

instinctive

 

typical

 
shades

manner

 
opportunity
 
meeting
 

examples

 

taking

 

medium

 

affection

 

experiment

 

accustomed

 

conversation