FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27  
28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   >>  
same time pointing out the essential usefulness of the _Short View_ as a corrective. He was not particularly original, for many of the points he made were considered public property by writers in the controversy. Thus, along with Dennis and others, the writer admitted the necessity for reform, but opposed Collier's apparent desire to abolish the stage. He pointed out the fallacy of Collier's argument from the authority of the church fathers and the absurdity of his contentions about the ridicule of the clergy. And using ancient doctrine, he defended the stage as an instrument of instruction in manners and morals. Of particular interest is his belief that the stage had contributed to the improvement of the language, especially in dissuading the clergy from a fantastic, conceited rhetoric. The fury of Collier's attack seemed to dull the wits of the defenders of the stage. Too often they allowed themselves to be drawn into quibbling over trivialities. None of them distinguished himself with a brilliant answer. With the exception of Dennis's _The Usefulness of the Stage_, the _Letter to A.H. Esq._ is as suave and sensible as any of the answers, and considerably better then many. Among the pamphlets taking the part of Collier was _The Occasional Paper: Number IX_, attributed to Richard Willia, Chaplain to William III and later Bishop of Winchester. In this paper the approach of literary criticism is abandoned completely, the author feeling that the controversy over the stage has already been obscured by wit and learning. He concerns himself with religion and morality, and argues the danger of going to plays. Though he admits that good plays are possible, it is clear that he considers the stage a bad influence upon Christians. Collier might veil his true attitude toward the theater, but Willis makes no pretense of hiding his. Plays are bad. The _Letter to A.H. Esq._ was announced in the _Post Man_ of June 11-13, 1698; _The Occasional Paper: Number IX_ was noted in the same journal for May 19-21, 1698. The copy of the _Letter to A.H. Esq._ reprinted here is owned by the University of Michigan. _The Occasional Paper: No. IX_ is reproduced by permission of the The Huntington Library, San Marino, California. H. T. Swedenberg, Jr. University of California, Los Angeles A LETTER TO A.H. Esq; Concerning the STAGE. LONDON, Printed for A. Baldwin, near the Oxford-Arms in Warwick-Lane, 1698. (I) T
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27  
28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   >>  



Top keywords:

Collier

 
Occasional
 

Letter

 
California
 

clergy

 

University

 

Number

 

Dennis

 

controversy

 

danger


morality

 

religion

 
argues
 

considers

 

influence

 

Though

 
admits
 

Christians

 
Winchester
 

approach


Bishop
 

Willia

 

Chaplain

 

William

 

literary

 

criticism

 

obscured

 

learning

 

abandoned

 

completely


author

 

feeling

 

concerns

 
pretense
 
Swedenberg
 

Angeles

 

LETTER

 
Marino
 

reproduced

 

permission


Huntington

 

Library

 

Concerning

 

Warwick

 

Oxford

 
LONDON
 

Printed

 
Baldwin
 

Michigan

 

hiding