FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288  
289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   >>   >|  
tonnage." Under color of grants like this, that prohibition might be wholly evaded. This grant authorizes Messrs. Livingston and Fulton to license navigation in the waters of New York. They, of course, license it on their own terms. They may require a pecuniary consideration, ascertained by the tonnage of the vessel, or in any other manner. Probably, in fact, they govern themselves, in this respect, by the size or tonnage of the vessels to which they grant licenses. Now, what is this but substantially a tonnage duty, under the law of the State? Or does it make any difference, whether the receipts go directly into her own treasury, or into the hands of those to whom she has made the grant? There is, lastly, that provision of the Constitution which gives Congress power to promote the progress of science and the useful arts, by securing to authors and inventors, for a limited time, an exclusive right to their own writings and discoveries. Congress has exercised this power, and made all the provisions which it deemed useful or necessary. The States may, indeed, like munificent individuals, exercise their own bounty towards authors and inventors, at their own discretion. But to confer reward by exclusive grants, even if it were but a part of the use of the writing or invention, is not supposed to be a power properly to be exercised by the States. Much less can they, under the notion of conferring rewards in such cases, grant monopolies, the enjoyment of which is essentially incompatible with the exercise of rights possessed under the laws of the United States. I shall insist, however, the less on these points, as they are open to counsel who will come after me on the same side, and as I have said so much upon what appears to me the more important and interesting part of the argument. [Footnote 1: 1 Laws U.S., p. 28, Bioren and Duane's ed.] [Footnote 2: 1 Laws U.S., p. 50.] [Footnote 3: Chancellor Livingston.] [Footnote 4: 1 Black. Com. 273; 4 Black. Com. 160.] THE BUNKER HILL MONUMENT. AN ADDRESS DELIVERED AT THE LAYING OF THE CORNER-STONE OF THE BUNKER HILL MONUMENT AT CHARLESTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, ON THE 17TH OF JUNE, 1825. [As early as 1776, some steps were taken toward the commemoration of the battle of Bunker Hill and the fall of General Warren, who was buried upon the hill the day after the action. The Massachusetts Lodge of Masons, over which he presided, applied to the provisional government o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288  
289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

tonnage

 

Footnote

 

States

 

exercised

 

BUNKER

 

Congress

 

authors

 
inventors
 

exercise

 

exclusive


MONUMENT

 

Livingston

 
license
 
grants
 
United
 
rights
 

possessed

 

insist

 

counsel

 

appears


Bioren

 

argument

 

interesting

 
important
 

points

 
ADDRESS
 
General
 

Warren

 

buried

 

Bunker


commemoration

 

battle

 

applied

 
presided
 

provisional

 

government

 
action
 

Massachusetts

 

Masons

 
incompatible

DELIVERED
 

Chancellor

 

LAYING

 

CORNER

 

CHARLESTOWN

 

MASSACHUSETTS

 

substantially

 

licenses

 

vessels

 

govern