FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  
s. He did not make the choice, it was made FOR him by forces which he could not control. Free Will has always existed in WORDS, but it stops there, I think--stops short of FACT. I would not use those words--Free Will--but others. Y.M. What others? O.M. Free Choice. Y.M. What is the difference? O.M. The one implies untrammeled power to ACT as you please, the other implies nothing beyond a mere MENTAL PROCESS: the critical ability to determine which of two things is nearest right and just. Y.M. Make the difference clear, please. O.M. The mind can freely SELECT, CHOOSE, POINT OUT the right and just one--its function stops there. It can go no further in the matter. It has no authority to say that the right one shall be acted upon and the wrong one discarded. That authority is in other hands. Y.M. The man's? O.M. In the machine which stands for him. In his born disposition and the character which has been built around it by training and environment. Y.M. It will act upon the right one of the two? O.M. It will do as it pleases in the matter. George Washington's machine would act upon the right one; Pizarro would act upon the wrong one. Y.M. Then as I understand it a bad man's mental machinery calmly and judicially points out which of two things is right and just-- O.M. Yes, and his MORAL machinery will freely act upon the other or the other, according to its make, and be quite indifferent to the MIND'S feeling concerning the matter--that is, WOULD be, if the mind had any feelings; which it hasn't. It is merely a thermometer: it registers the heat and the cold, and cares not a farthing about either. Y.M. Then we must not claim that if a man KNOWS which of two things is right he is absolutely BOUND to do that thing? O.M. His temperament and training will decide what he shall do, and he will do it; he cannot help himself, he has no authority over the mater. Wasn't it right for David to go out and slay Goliath? Y.M. Yes. O.M. Then it would have been equally RIGHT for any one else to do it? Y.M. Certainly. O.M. Then it would have been RIGHT for a born coward to attempt it? Y.M. It would--yes. O.M. You know that no born coward ever would have attempted it, don't you? Y.M. Yes. O.M. You know that a born coward's make and temperament would be an absolute and insurmountable bar to his ever essaying such a thing, don't you? Y.M. Yes, I know it. O.M. He clearly perceives that it w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

matter

 

authority

 

coward

 

things

 

training

 
machine
 

freely

 

temperament

 

implies

 

machinery


difference
 

feelings

 

feeling

 

thermometer

 

farthing

 

registers

 

attempt

 
attempted
 

Certainly

 

Goliath


equally

 

absolute

 

perceives

 

essaying

 

insurmountable

 

absolutely

 
decide
 
indifferent
 

untrammeled

 
Choice

determine

 

nearest

 

ability

 
critical
 

MENTAL

 

PROCESS

 

forces

 

choice

 
control
 

existed


Pizarro

 

understand

 

Washington

 

George

 

environment

 

pleases

 
mental
 
points
 

calmly

 

judicially