FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206  
1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   >>   >|  
nce. Proctor, Adelaide A. Ritchie, Anne Thackeray. Rollitt, Sir Albert, Earl of Selborne. Salisbury, Marquis of. Prime Minister. Selborne, Earl of. Sidgwick, Mrs. Henry, Princ. of Newnham. Somerset, Lady Henry, Pres. World's W. C. T. U. Somerville, Mary, Astronomer. Stead, Wm. T. Tallon, Daniel. Lord Mayor of Dublin. Taylor, Peter A., M. P., and Mrs. Thomson (Archbish. of York), Mrs. Todd, Isabella M. S. (Ireland). Unwin, Jane Cobden. Wigham, Eliza. Wollstonecraft, Mary, Author of Rights of Woman (1792). Woodall, William, M. P. Wyndham, Hon. George. FRANCE. Dumas, Alexandre (fils). Hugo, Victor. AUSTRALIA. Barton, Edmund, Premier. Cockburn, Sir John, K. C. W. G., Kingston, Hon. C. C., Premier S. Aus. Lyne, Sir William, Premier N. S. W. Onslow, Lady. Parkes, Sir Henry, Premier N. S. W. Reid, Sir G. H., Premier N. S. W. Turner, Sir George, Premier Victoria. Windeyer, Lady. NEW ZEALAND. Hall, Sir John. Seddon, H. J., Premier. Stout, Sir Robert, Premier. Vogel, Sir Julius, Colonial Treas. CANADA. Hall, Sir John, M. P. MacDonald, Sir John, Premier. SOUTH AFRICA. Schreiner, Olive. TESTIMONY FROM WOMAN SUFFRAGE STATES.[501] No attempt is made to give here the mass of testimony which is easily available from the States where women vote, but only enough is presented to show its nature and the character of those who offer it. In the four States where women have exercised the full franchise for from six to thirty-three years, not half a dozen reputable persons have said over their own names that any of the evils which were so freely predicted have come to pass or that its effect upon men, women or the community has been other than good. The small amount of criticism which has been openly made has been anonymous or from those whose word was entitled to no weight. There is not another public question on which the testimony is so uniformly one-sided, and similar evidence on any other would be accepted as sufficiently conclusive to demand a unanimous verdict in its favor. In 1901 Amos R. Wells, editor of the _Christian Endeavor World_, wrote to twenty-five ministers of several different denominations, choosing their names at random among his subscribers in the equal suffrage States, and asking them whether equal suffrage was working well, fairly well or badly. One answered that it worked badly, three tha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206  
1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Premier

 

States

 

George

 

suffrage

 

William

 

testimony

 

Selborne

 

Rollitt

 

Albert

 

public


community

 

amount

 
Thackeray
 

anonymous

 

weight

 
criticism
 

openly

 

entitled

 

persons

 
Sidgwick

reputable

 

Newnham

 

Minister

 

freely

 
predicted
 

question

 

Salisbury

 
Marquis
 

effect

 

random


subscribers

 

choosing

 
denominations
 

ministers

 

Adelaide

 

answered

 

worked

 
fairly
 
working
 

Proctor


twenty

 

accepted

 

sufficiently

 

conclusive

 

evidence

 

uniformly

 

similar

 
demand
 

unanimous

 

editor