FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221  
1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   >>   >|  
ol district office in any union free school district unless he or she is a qualified voter in such district and is able to read and write," permits women to hold office as members of the board of education and other district offices. Aside from Chapter 214 of the Laws of 1892, which has been held to be unconstitutional, I know of no provision of law extending school suffrage to women in _cities_, except that charters of certain third class cities have extended to women tax-payers the right to vote upon a proposition involving the raising of a tax. By the Public Officers' Law, Chap. 681 of the Laws of 1892, Section 3, it is provided that "No person shall be capable of holding a civil office who shall not, at the time he shall be chosen thereto, be of full age, a citizen of the United States, and resident of the State, and, if it be a local office, a resident of the political subdivision or municipal corporation of the State for which he shall be chosen, or within which the electors electing him reside, or within which his official functions are required to be exercised." In the case of Findlay against Thorn, in the City Court of New York, where the question arose as to the right of a woman to exercise the office of notary public, Chief Justice McAdam refused to pass upon the question, holding that the right could be decided only in a direct proceeding brought for the purpose by the Attorney-General, in which the notary might defend her title. And the court adds: "Whether a female is capable of holding a public office has never been decided by the courts of this State and it is a question about which legal minds may well differ. The Constitution regulates the right of suffrage and limits it to 'male' citizens. Disabilities are not favored and are seldom extended by implication, from which it may be argued that if it required the insertion of the term 'male' to exclude female citizens of lawful age from the right of suffrage, a similar limitation would be required to disqualify them from holding office. Citizenship is a condition or status and has no relation to age or sex. It may be contended that it was left to the good sense of the Executive and to the electors to determine whether or not they would elect females to office a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221  
1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

office

 

district

 

holding

 

question

 

required

 

suffrage

 

resident

 

chosen

 

capable

 

female


extended

 

citizens

 
cities
 

electors

 

public

 
notary
 

school

 

decided

 

exercise

 
defend

General

 

brought

 

purpose

 

proceeding

 
McAdam
 

Justice

 

refused

 
direct
 

Attorney

 

regulates


status

 

relation

 
condition
 

Citizenship

 

limitation

 

disqualify

 

contended

 
females
 
determine
 

Executive


similar

 

lawful

 

differ

 

courts

 

Constitution

 

argued

 

insertion

 
exclude
 

implication

 

seldom