FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>  
Great enthusiasm is felt at Washington and throughout the country, as it becomes evident that a brilliant and successful plan has been adopted, and great anxiety is evinced to find out and reward the author. For this purpose a lively debate takes place in the House of Representatives for the avowed purpose of finding out whether "these victories were arranged or won by men sitting at a distance, engaged in organizing victory," or whether "they have been achieved by bold and resolute men left free to act and to conquer." No one knows. Mr. Conkling proposes to "thank Halleck and Grant." Mr. Washburne thinks "General McClernand and General Logan should be included." Mr. Cox thinks "General Smith is entitled to an equal degree of the glory." Mr. Holman thinks "General Wallace should have a fair share." Mr. Mallory thinks "General Buell should not be forgotten." Mr. Kellogg thinks all these suggestions derogatory to President Lincoln, as Commander-in-Chief. He desires "it to be remembered that subordinate officers by law are under the control and command of the Commander-in-Chief of the American Army." He believes "there is, emanating from the Commander-in-Chief of the American forces, through his first subordinates, and by them to the next, and so continuously down to the soldiers who fight upon the battlefield, a well digested, clear, and definite policy of campaign, that is in motion to put down this rebellion;" and he "here declares that he believes that the system of movements that has culminated in glorious victories, and which will soon put down this rebellion, finds root, brain, and execution in the Commanding General of the American Army and the Chief Executive of the American people." Mr. Olin says: "If it be the object of the House, before passing a vote of thanks, to ascertain who was the person who planned and organized these victories, then it would be eminently proper to request the Secretary of War to give us that information. That would satisfy the gentleman and the House directly as to who was the party that planned these military movements. It is sufficient for the present that somebody has planned and executed these military movements. Still, if the gentleman has any desire to know who originated these movements, he can ascertain that fact by inquiring at the proper office, for certainly some one at the War Department must be informed on the subject. The Secretary of War knows whether
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>  



Top keywords:
General
 
thinks
 
movements
 
American
 

victories

 

planned

 

Commander

 

military

 

rebellion

 

Secretary


proper

 

ascertain

 

gentleman

 

believes

 

purpose

 

digested

 

execution

 
people
 
Executive
 

Commanding


battlefield

 

definite

 
policy
 

declares

 

motion

 

soldiers

 
system
 

campaign

 

continuously

 
enthusiasm

glorious

 
culminated
 

originated

 

desire

 
executed
 

inquiring

 

office

 

subject

 

informed

 

Department


present

 
person
 
organized
 

eminently

 

object

 

passing

 

request

 

sufficient

 

directly

 
satisfy