FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  
, and might go on for ever using his senses with impunity "to cure his soul," defiling English society with the moral pestilence which is incarnate in him, but for one thing. That is his sudden impulse not merely to murder the painter--which might be artistically defended on the plea that it is only a fresh development of his scheme for realizing every phase of life-experience--but to rip up the canvas in a rage, merely because, though he had permitted himself to do one good action, it had not made his portrait less hideous. But all this is inconsistent with Dorian Gray's cool, calculating, conscienceless character, evolved logically enough by Mr Wilde's "New Hedonism." Then Mr. Wilde finishes his story by saying that on hearing a heavy fall Dorian Gray's servants rushed in, found the portrait on the wall as youthful looking as ever, its senile ugliness being transferred to the foul profligate himself, who is lying on the floor stabbed to the heart. This is a sham moral, as indeed everything in the book is a sham, except the one element in the book which will taint every young mind that comes in contact with it. That element is shockingly real, and it is the plausibly insinuated defence of the creed that appeals to the senses "to cure the soul" whenever the spiritual nature of man suffers from too much purity and self-denial. The rest of this number of _Lippincott_ consists of articles of harmless padding. [11] June 30th, 1890. * * * * * _When critics disagree the artist is in accord with himself._ * * * * * OSCAR WILDE'S REPLY. "DORIAN GRAY." To the Editor of the _Daily Chronicle_.[12] Sir,--Will you allow me to correct some errors into which your critic has fallen in his review of my story, "The Picture of Dorian Gray," published in to-day's issue of your paper? Your critic states, to begin with, that I make desperate attempts to "vamp up" a moral in my story. Now I must candidly confess that I do not know what "vamping" is. I see, from time to time, mysterious advertisements in the newspapers about "How to Vamp," but what vamping really means remains a mystery to me--a mystery that, like all other mysteries, I hope some day to explore. However, I do not propose to discuss the absurd terms used by modern journalism. What I want to say is that, so far from wishing to emphasise any moral in my story, the real trouble I exper
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Dorian

 

vamping

 
portrait
 

mystery

 

critic

 

element

 

senses

 
padding
 

errors

 

defiling


society

 

correct

 

English

 
harmless
 
impunity
 

consists

 

published

 
Picture
 

fallen

 

review


articles
 

artist

 
accord
 

disagree

 

critics

 

Chronicle

 

Editor

 

DORIAN

 

discuss

 
absurd

propose

 

However

 

mysteries

 
explore
 

modern

 
journalism
 
emphasise
 

trouble

 

wishing

 
remains

candidly

 
confess
 
Lippincott
 

desperate

 

attempts

 

newspapers

 

mysterious

 
advertisements
 
states
 

pestilence