peoples--and not to a board representing
all nations--of those attributes of sovereignty which the other states
would be constrained to give up. Of these three currents flowing in the
direction of internationalism only one--that of finance--appears for the
moment likely to reach its goal....
FOOTNOTES:
[36] _L'Humanite,_ March 6 and 18, 1919.
[37] Cf. _L'Humanite_, April 10,1919.
[38] The sentence was subsequently commuted.
[39] _La Gazette de Lausanne_, May 26, 1919.
[40] 128th Division.
[41] It was reproduced by the French Syndicalist organ, _L'Humanite_ of
July 7, 1919.
[42] R. de Saussure. Cf. _Journal de Geneve_, August 18, and also May
26, 1919.
[43] d, r, t, l, g (partly) and p, except at the beginning of a word.
[44] Cf. the French papers generally for the month of May--also
_Bonsoir_, July 26, 1919.
[45] Walther Rathenau has dealt with this question in several of his
recent pamphlets, which are not before me at the moment.
III
THE DELEGATES
The plenipotentiaries, who became the world's arbiters for a while, were
truly representative men. But they mirrored forth not so much the souls
of their respective peoples as the surface spirit that flitted over an
evanescent epoch. They stood for national grandeur, territorial
expansion, party interests, and even abstract ideas. Exponents of a
narrow section of the old order at its lowest ebb, they were in no sense
heralds of the new. Amid a labyrinth of ruins they had no clue to guide
their footsteps, in which the peoples of the world were told to follow.
Only true political vision, breadth of judgment, thorough mastery of the
elements of the situation, an instinct for discerning central issues,
genuine concern for high principles of governance, and the rare moral
courage that disregards popularity as a mainspring of action--could have
fitted any set of legislators to tackle the complex and thorny problems
that pressed for settlement and to effect the necessary preliminary
changes. That the delegates of the principal Powers were devoid of many
of these qualities cannot fairly be made a subject of reproach. It was
merely an accident. But it was as unfortunate as their honest conviction
that they could accomplish the grandiose enterprise of remodeling the
communities of the world without becoming conversant with their
interests, acquainted with their needs, or even aware of their
whereabouts. For their failure, which was inevitable,
|