FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   >>  
he sight of passers-by?_ Why do ladies leave the dinner-table before the men begin to smoke? To avoid the smell of tobacco--which is well known to be aromatic, healthy, and delightful--or _because the natural modesty of women shrinks from witnessing the striking of a match?_ Why, in a railway-carriage, do you hold your fusee out of window when you light it? Is it because you do not care about being half-choked--a paltry plea--or is it to conceal from young persons who may be in the carriage the sparkle which must inevitably remind them of wicked and alluring eyes? "_To get a light, or because others do it._" Is that true? Do not trifle with the question. Read all my works. Do not get them from a contemptible circulating library, but buy them. II. Some may not yet be convinced that the striking of matches is suggestive and immoral. To me nearly everything is suggestive, but there are some stupid persons in England. I will be patient with them, and give them more evidence. A wax match is called a vesta. Who was Vesta? But this is too horrible. I cannot pursue this point in a periodical which is read in families. I can only refer you to the classical dictionary, and remind you that everything must infallibly suggest its opposite. Again, there are matches which strike _only_ on the box. It distresses me to write these words. The idea of "onlyness," of restriction, must bring matrimony to the mind of everyone. If you do not know what I think about marriage, buy _The Kreutzer Sonata_. It is not customary to have more than one wife. Consequently, anything which has _one_ in it--as, for instance, the date of WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR--reminds me of marriage, and is, therefore, degrading. Why, the very word "match" suggests marriage: and yet we allow young children to sell whole boxes of them in the streets. Horrible! Do you think our lower orders would become discontented, and strike, if they had not seen matches doing it first? Still more horrible! Finally, you strike a match that never struck you, that never offended you in any way. Is that just, or even manly? Yet, in nine cases out of ten, the law takes no notice of the offence. "_To get a light, or because others do it._" Are you not convinced now that, when you use these words, you are not speaking the truth? III. I do not think I ever met anybody who was quite as moral, or quite as original, as I am. You should give a complete set of my works to each of y
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   >>  



Top keywords:

matches

 

strike

 

marriage

 

persons

 

suggestive

 

convinced

 

remind

 

carriage

 

striking

 
horrible

Kreutzer
 

matrimony

 

Sonata

 
children
 

instance

 

reminds

 
CONQUEROR
 

WILLIAM

 
degrading
 

customary


Consequently
 

suggests

 

speaking

 

offence

 

notice

 

complete

 

original

 

discontented

 

orders

 

streets


Horrible

 

offended

 

Finally

 
struck
 

window

 

shrinks

 

witnessing

 
railway
 

choked

 
paltry

alluring
 
trifle
 

wicked

 

inevitably

 

conceal

 

sparkle

 

modesty

 

dinner

 
ladies
 

passers