FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266  
267   >>  
unreserved conversation too short; whenever I leave her, I recollect a thousand things I had to say, a thousand new ideas to communicate, and am impatient for the hour of seeing again, without restraint, the most amiable and pleasing of woman-kind. My happiness would be complete, if I did not sometimes see a cloud of anxiety on that dear countenance, which, however, is dissipated the moment my eyes meet hers. I am going to Temple's, and the chaise is at the door. Adieu! my dear friend! Your affectionate Ed. Rivers. LETTER 216. To Colonel Rivers. Nov. 14. So you disapprove male friendships, my sweet Colonel! I thought you had better ideas of things in general. Fitzgerald and I have been disputing on French and English manners, in regard to gallantry. The great question is, Whether a man is more hurt by the imprudent conduct of his daughter or his wife? Much may be said on both sides. There is some hazard in suffering coquetry in either; both contribute to give charms to conversation, and introduce ease and politeness into society; but both are dangerous to manners. Our customs, however, are most likely to produce good effects, as they give opportunity for love marriages, the only ones which can make worthy minds happy. The coquetry of single women has a point of view consistent with honor; that of married women has generally no point of view at all; it is, however of use _pour passer le tems_. As to real gallantry, the French style depraves the minds of men least, ours is most favorable to the peace of families. I think I preserve the balance of argument admirably. My opinion, however, is, that if people married from affection, there would be no such thing as gallantry at all. Pride, and the parade of life, destroy all happiness: our whole felicity depends on our choice in marriage, yet we chuse from motives more trifling than would determine us in the common affairs of life. I knew a gentleman who fancied himself in love, yet delayed marrying his mistress till he could afford a set of plate. Modern manners are very unfavorable to the tender affections. Ancient lovers had only dragons to combat; ours have the worse monsters of avarice and ambition. All I shall say further on the subject is, that the two happiest people I ever knew were a country clergyman and his wife, whose whole income did not exceed one hundred pounds a year. A pretty phi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266  
267   >>  



Top keywords:

gallantry

 

manners

 

people

 

Rivers

 

things

 

coquetry

 

Colonel

 

conversation

 
married
 
happiness

thousand

 

French

 
affection
 

parade

 

destroy

 

felicity

 

passer

 
generally
 

depraves

 
preserve

balance

 
argument
 

admirably

 

families

 

depends

 

favorable

 

opinion

 

subject

 

happiest

 

ambition


avarice
 

dragons

 
lovers
 

combat

 

monsters

 

pounds

 

pretty

 

hundred

 

clergyman

 

country


income

 

exceed

 

Ancient

 

affections

 

common

 

affairs

 
gentleman
 

fancied

 

consistent

 

determine