FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>  
that a ball cannot be curved, even when they have ocular demonstration of the fact. But that has nothing to do with what I have to say. I have studied the diagram of my anonymous friend, and am convinced that he is exactly wrong. With the following diagrams I shall show which way a ball curves with a given rotation, and give my theory of the curve: [Illustration] Suppose, as in the letter published, the ball moves one hundred feet per second, and revolves so that the equator moves around at the same rate. Then, in the first diagram, the friction at B is greatest, and at D is 0. But instead of curving as my anonymous friend demonstrates, it will curve in exactly the _opposite_ direction; namely, in the same direction in which it rotates. I have appended diagram 2, simply to show the curve where the friction is 0 at B and greatest at D. Then it will curve as indicated. I have a short theory, namely: In the first diagram, the more rapid movement of B compresses the air on that side, while at D it is in its normal state. Hence the pressure at B more than counterbalances that at D, and, as it were, shoves the ball in the direction of the side D, thus producing the curve. In the 2d diagram, the letters B and D interchange in the theory. I would like to hear more about this subject. Very respectfully yours, F. C. J. * * * * * BIRMINGHAM, MICH. DEAR ST. NICHOLAS: I have read with great interest the articles in the October, December, and February numbers, about curve-pitching. I have had quite a good deal of experience in the "one,-two,-three,-and-out" line myself, and have also, for the last two or three years, been able to make others have the same experience, by putting them out, in the same way. Therefore, I venture a reply to the explanation in the February number, backing my statement by the experience of many eminent curve-pitchers, and also by the story in the October number of "How Science Won the Game." [Illustration] The above diagram is the same as your correspondent uses, and he asserts that the point B is moving faster than D; consequently, there is more friction at B, whence B is retarded more than D, and so the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>  



Top keywords:

diagram

 

direction

 

friction

 

experience

 
theory
 
Illustration
 

greatest

 

number

 

February

 

October


anonymous

 

friend

 

BIRMINGHAM

 

respectfully

 

articles

 

numbers

 

December

 
interest
 

pitching

 

NICHOLAS


putting
 
correspondent
 

Science

 

asserts

 

retarded

 

faster

 

moving

 
pitchers
 

subject

 

Therefore


statement

 
eminent
 

backing

 
explanation
 

venture

 

movement

 
curves
 
rotation
 

diagrams

 

Suppose


revolves

 

hundred

 

letter

 

published

 

convinced

 

ocular

 
curved
 

demonstration

 
studied
 

equator