FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   >>  
ty-six Years in the Army_, while devoting many pages to the Battle of Franklin, Schofield has nothing to say about his failure to give some personal attention to the very extraordinary situation that developed right under his nose, so to speak. The audacity he displayed in claiming credit for the victory, while in Washington soon after the battle and finding that the administration was ignorant of its details, was a brilliant stroke of genius of its kind--but not such genius as any lover of his country will wish to see encouraged among the ambitious officers in our army. Cox was with Schofield in Washington and must have rendered invaluable assistance. No doubt each certified to the meritorious services of the other and Cox got his share of the reward in his promotion to the command of the twenty-third corps. Is it any wonder that two such able but unscrupulous men, while working together, with no one present to question their claims, should score such a success in deceiving President Lincoln? Was it for the meritorious services Schofield rendered, while sitting idly in Doctor Cliffe's house, utterly indifferent to the reports coming to him of the preparations of the enemy for assault; and was it for the gallantry he displayed when he skedaddled to the fort across the river as soon as the firing began, thereby abandoning the conduct of the battle to his subordinates, that they claimed the promotion he was given? If he had received the award his conduct that day so justly merited, would it not have come in the verdict of a court-martial such as he declares in his book ought to have been given to Wagner, Lane, and Conrad? "According to the established rules of war these three commanders" and Schofield and Cox "ought to have been tried by court-martial and, if found guilty, shot or cashiered for sacrificing their own men and endangering the army." If any of the blame attached to General Stanley, he washed it away gallantly with the blood of his wound. JOHN K. SHELLENBERGER. Hampton, Virginia, November 5, 1915. THE BATTLE OF FRANKLIN Any facts or information concerning the Battle of Franklin coming my way has always been devoured with a greedy interest, and because of this interest, I have given far more research to this battle than to any other in which I was engaged. On account of the open character of the battle-field, the limited area, where the fighting raged, and my presence in the midst of that ar
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   >>  



Top keywords:

battle

 

Schofield

 

promotion

 

meritorious

 

services

 

rendered

 
genius
 

Washington

 

Franklin

 
conduct

Battle

 

coming

 

displayed

 

martial

 
interest
 

declares

 
guilty
 

endangering

 

claimed

 

abandoning


sacrificing
 

subordinates

 

cashiered

 

According

 

established

 
verdict
 

Wagner

 

Conrad

 

merited

 

received


justly

 

commanders

 

Hampton

 

research

 

engaged

 
devoured
 

greedy

 
account
 

presence

 

fighting


character

 
limited
 

SHELLENBERGER

 

gallantly

 

attached

 

General

 
Stanley
 

washed

 
firing
 
Virginia