FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
] "The Ostrich," _Zoologist_, March 1897; quoted by Havelock Ellis, _Psychology of Sex_, Vol. III. p. 34. [69] Audubon, _Scenes de la Nature_, Vol. I. p. 317. [70] J. Lewis Bonhote, _The Birds of Britain_, p. 39. [71] Audubon, _Scenes de la Nature_, Vol. I. p. 383. [72] Epinas, _Societes Animales_, p. 299. [73] _Argentine Ornithology_, Vol. I. p. 148; quoted by Havelock Ellis, _Psychology of Sex_, Vol. III. p. 33. [74] Wallace, _Darwinism_, p. 284; also J. Lewis Bonhote, _The Birds of Britain_, p. 319. [75] Letourneau, _Evolution of Marriage_, pp. 14-15. [76] Wallace, _Darwinism_, p. 287. [77] H.O. Forbes, _A Naturalist's Wanderings_, p. 131; quoted by Havelock Ellis, _Psychology of Sex_, Vol. III. pp. 33-34. [78] Darwin, _Descent of Man_, p. 438. [79] Epinas, _Soc. animales_, p. 326; and Letourneau, _Evolution of Marriage_, p. 14. [80] Darwin, _Descent of Man_, p. 438; Letourneau, _op. cit._, p. 13. [81] _Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale di Genova_, t. IX. fasc. 3-4, 1877, quoted by Letourneau, whose account I give; _op. cit._, p. 14. [82] Havelock Ellis, _Psychology of Sex_, Vol. III. pp. 18-24, has discussed this question at some length. The brief account I have given is a summary of his view. I take this opportunity of gratefully acknowledging the great help I have gained from the illuminating and valuable works of Mr. Ellis. [83] These facts are taken from Mr. J. Lewis Bonhote's _British Birds_. I may add that in many species where the sexes are alike the young are quite different from the parents, a fact which seems to have escaped the notice of those who say that the young birds resemble the female. A very curious instance is furnished by the greater spotted woodpecker, where the sexes are similar, but the female lacks the red crown of the male; and yet the young _of both sexes_ have this red crown. [84] This seems to be the position taken by Professor Geddes and J.A. Thomson in _Evolution of Sex_, pp. 4-5. [85] Several examples are mentioned by Wallace, _Darwinism_, p. 281. He, however, brings them forward in quite a different connection to prove his theory of the protective duller colours of the female birds. [86] My facts of the phalaropes are taken from J. Lewis Bonhote's _British Birds_, pp. 314-315. [87] _Pure Sociology_, p. 331. [88] Epinas, _Soc. animales_, p. 422. [89] Audubon, _Scenes de la Nature_, t. Ier, p. 29. I may say, that at the time of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Bonhote
 

Letourneau

 

Havelock

 
Psychology
 

quoted

 
Epinas
 

Darwinism

 

Evolution

 

Wallace

 

Scenes


female

 
Nature
 

Audubon

 

account

 

animales

 

Descent

 

British

 

Marriage

 

Britain

 
Darwin

similar

 

woodpecker

 
spotted
 

furnished

 

greater

 

Zoologist

 

Ostrich

 
instance
 

curious

 
escaped

parents

 

notice

 

resemble

 

Professor

 
phalaropes
 

duller

 

colours

 
Sociology
 

protective

 

theory


Several

 
examples
 

Thomson

 

Geddes

 

mentioned

 

forward

 

connection

 

brings

 

position

 

species