FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165  
166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   >>   >|  
te can not by us be comprehended, conceived, or thought. _Faith_ is the organ by which we apprehend what is beyond knowledge. We believe in the existence of God, but we can not _know_ God. This class, also, may be again subdivided into-- 1. Those who affirm that our idea of the Infinite First Cause is grounded on an _intuitional_ or subjective faith, necessitated by an "impotence of thought"--that is, by a mental inability to conceive an absolute limitation or an infinite illimitation, an absolute commencement or an infinite non-commencement. Both contradictory opposites are equally incomprehensible and inconceivable to us; and yet, though unable to view either as possible, we are forced by a higher law--the "Law of Excluded Middle"--to admit that one, and only one, is necessary (_e. g_., Hamilton and Mansel). 2. Those who assert that our idea of God rests solely on an _historical_ or objective faith in testimony--the testimony of Scripture, which assures us that, in the course of history, God has manifested his existence in an objective manner to the senses, and given verbal communications of his character and will to men; human reason being utterly incapacitated by the fall, and the consequent depravity of man, to attain any knowledge of the unity, spirituality, and righteousness of God (_e. g_., Watson, and Dogmatic Theologians generally). It will thus be manifest that the great question, the central and vital question which demands a thorough and searching consideration, is the following, to wit: _Is God cognizable by human reason_? Can man attain to a positive cognition of God--can he _know_ God; or is all our supposed knowledge "a learned ignorance,"[210] an unreasoning faith? We venture to answer this question in the affirmative. Human reason is now adequate to the cognition of God; it is able, with the fullest confidence, to affirm the being of a God, and, in some degree, to determine his character. The parties and schools above referred to answer this question in the negative form. Whether Theologians or Atheists, they are singularly agreed in denying to human reason all possibility of _knowing_ God. [Footnote 210: Hamilton's "Philosophy," p. 512.] Before entering upon the discussion of the negative positions enumerated in the above classification, it may be important we should state our own position explicitly, and exhibit what we regard as the true doctrine of the genesis of the idea of God in the h
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165  
166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
question
 

reason

 

knowledge

 
character
 

answer

 

thought

 

cognition

 

commencement

 

negative

 

Theologians


infinite

 
testimony
 

absolute

 
objective
 
existence
 

attain

 

Hamilton

 

affirm

 

affirmative

 

generally


ignorance

 

unreasoning

 

venture

 

manifest

 

consideration

 
searching
 

central

 

demands

 

positive

 

supposed


cognizable

 

learned

 
Atheists
 

positions

 

enumerated

 

classification

 

important

 

discussion

 

Before

 

entering


doctrine
 
genesis
 

regard

 

exhibit

 

position

 
explicitly
 

Philosophy

 
degree
 
determine
 

parties