FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  
not Dr. Munro's. { Fig. 19: p120a.jpg} We know not their original meaning, but they occur "all over the place"; in amber on the Baltic coast, with grotesque faces carved in amber. In Russia and Finland, and in sites of prehistoric Egypt, on slate, and in other materials such grotesques are common. {120b} Egypt is a great centre of the Early Slate School of Art, the things ranging from slate plaques covered with disorderly scratchings "without a conscience or an aim," to highly decorated _palettes_. There is even a perforated object like the slate crooks of M. Cartailhac, from Portugal, but rather more like the silhouette of a bird, {121a} and there are decorative mace-heads in soft stone. {121b} Some of the prehistoric figurines of human beings from Egypt are studded with "cups," _cupules_, _ecuelles_, or whatever we may be permitted to name them. In short, early and rude races turn out much the same set of crude works of art almost everywhere, and the extraordinary thing is, not that a few are found in a corner of Britain, but that scarce any have been found. { Figs. 20, 21: p120b.jpg} As to the Russo-Finnish flint figurines, Mr. Abercromby thinks that these objects may "have served as household gods or personal amulets," and Dr. Munro regards Mr. Abercromby's as "the most rational explanation of their meaning and purpose." He speaks of figurines of clay (the most usual material) in Carniola, Bosnia, and Transylvania. "Idols and amulets were indeed universally used in prehistoric times." {121c} "Objects which come under the same category" occur "in various parts of America." Mr. Bruce {121d} refers to M. Reinach's vast collection of designs of such figurines in _L'Anthropologie_, vol. v., 1894. Thus rude figurines in sites of many stages are very familiar objects. The forger knew it, and dumped down a few at Dumbuck. His female figurine (photographed in fig. 19), seems to me a very "plausible" figurine in itself. It does not appear to me "unlike anything in any collection in the British Isles, or elsewhere"--I mean _elsewhere_. Dr. Munro admits that it discloses "the hand of one not altogether ignorant of art." {122} I add that it discloses the hand of one not at all ignorant of genuine prehistoric figurines representing women. But I know nothing analogous from _British_ sites. Either such things do not exist (of which we cannot be certain), or they have escaped discovery and record. Elsewher
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  



Top keywords:
figurines
 

prehistoric

 

British

 

Abercromby

 

objects

 
amulets
 
collection
 

things

 
figurine
 

meaning


discloses

 

ignorant

 
Objects
 

universally

 
America
 

refers

 
category
 
discovery
 

purpose

 

explanation


rational

 

Elsewher

 

record

 

speaks

 

escaped

 

Reinach

 

Transylvania

 

Bosnia

 

material

 

Carniola


genuine

 
plausible
 

photographed

 

personal

 

female

 
representing
 

altogether

 
unlike
 

Dumbuck

 
Anthropologie

analogous
 

designs

 
admits
 
Either
 

forger

 

dumped

 
familiar
 

stages

 
conscience
 

highly