FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27  
28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   >>   >|  
over-ruling the established course of the general Law of Nations." It is to the Maritime Courts, then, of this and other countries, that the hopes of civilization must look for improvement and advance in the canons of international intercourse during the unhappy time of war. The manner, and the feeling in which they are to pronounce those canons cannot be more finely enunciated than in the words of Lord Stowell himself. "I consider myself as stationed here, not to deliver occasional and shifting opinions to serve present purposes of particular national interest, but to administer with indifference that justice which the _Law of Nations_ holds out, without distinction, to independent states, some happening to be neutral, and some belligerent. "The seat of judicial authority is indeed locally _here_ in the belligerent country, according to the known law and practice of nations; _but the law itself has no locality_. It is the duty of the person who sits here to determine this question exactly as he would determine the same question, if sitting at Stockholm; to assert no pretensions on the part of Great Britain, which he would not allow to Sweden in the same circumstances; and to impose no duties on Sweden, as a neutral country, which he would not admit to belong to _Great Britain_, in the same character. If, therefore, I mistake the law in this matter, I mistake that which I consider, and which I mean should be considered, as UNIVERSAL LAW upon the question." When an Admiralty Judge investigates the law in this impartial spirit, he occupies the grand position of being in some respects the director of the deeds of nations; but with equal certainty does the taint of an unjust bias poison all his authority; his judgments are powerful then only for evil; they bind no one beyond the country in which he sits, and may become the motive and origin of reprisal and attack upon his native land. As the authority of the international judge depends on his integrity, so also does the universal law arise from, and remain supported by, the true principles of right and justice; in other words, by the fundamental distinction between right and wrong. A statute, a despotic prerogative, and an established principle of common law, rest upon different sanctions. They may be the causes of the greatest injustice, may sow the seeds of nat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27  
28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
question
 

authority

 

country

 

mistake

 
justice
 
neutral
 

nations

 
Britain
 

Sweden

 

belligerent


distinction

 

determine

 
established
 

canons

 
Nations
 
international
 

poison

 

unjust

 
powerful
 

general


judgments

 

respects

 

Admiralty

 
investigates
 

considered

 
UNIVERSAL
 

impartial

 

spirit

 

director

 

position


occupies

 

certainty

 
motive
 

despotic

 

prerogative

 

principle

 
common
 
statute
 

fundamental

 

injustice


greatest

 

sanctions

 

principles

 

depends

 
native
 

attack

 
origin
 

reprisal

 
integrity
 

supported