FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207  
208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>   >|  
xpressly declared in the acts for their admission, on a footing of perfect equality in every respect with the original members. This equality is as complete as the equality, before the laws, of the son with the father, immediately on the attainment by the former of his legal majority, without regard to the prior condition of dependence and tutelage. The relations of the original States to one another and to the Union can not be affected by any subsequent accessions of new members, as the Constitution fixes those relations permanently, and furnishes the normal standard which is applicable to all. The Boston memorial to Congress, referred to in a foregoing chapter, as prepared by a committee with Mr. Webster at its head, says that the new States "are universally considered as admitted into the Union upon the same footing as the original States, and as possessing, in respect to the Union, the same rights of _sovereignty, freedom, and independence_, as the other States." But, with regard to States formed of territory acquired by purchase from France, Spain, and Mexico, it is claimed that, as they were bought by the United States, they belong to the same, and have no right to withdraw at will from an association the property which had been purchased by the other parties. Happy would it have been if the equal rights of the people of _all_ the States to the enjoyment of territory acquired by the common treasure could have been recognized at the proper time! There would then have been no secession and no war. As for the sordid claim of ownership of States, on account of the money spent for the land which they contain--I can understand the ground of a claim to some interest in the soil, so long as it continues to be public property, but have yet to learn in what way the United States ever became purchaser of the _inhabitants_ or of their political rights. Any question in regard to property has always been admitted to be matter for fair and equitable settlement, in case of the withdrawal of a State. The treaty by which the Louisiana territory was ceded to the United States expressly provided that the inhabitants thereof should be "admitted, as soon as possible, according to the principles of the Federal Constitution, to the enjoyment of all the rights, advantages, and immunities of citizens of the United States."[104] In all other acquisitions of territory the same stipulation is either expressed or implied. Indeed, the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207  
208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 
United
 
territory
 

rights

 

regard

 

property

 

original

 

equality

 
admitted
 

enjoyment


Constitution

 

acquired

 

footing

 

relations

 

inhabitants

 

respect

 

members

 

ground

 

understand

 

interest


recognized
 

proper

 
treasure
 

people

 

common

 

ownership

 

account

 

sordid

 

secession

 

question


principles

 

thereof

 

expressly

 
provided
 

Federal

 

advantages

 

expressed

 
implied
 

Indeed

 

stipulation


acquisitions

 

immunities

 

citizens

 

Louisiana

 

treaty

 

purchaser

 

political

 

public

 

settlement

 

withdrawal