FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058  
1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   >>   >|  
his morning, which many of you heard, probably, that under the law as it stands the ladies who offered their votes had no right to vote whatever. I repeat that decision, and I charge you that they had no right to offer their votes. They having no right to offer their votes, the inspectors of election ought not to receive them. The additional question exists in this case whether the fact that they acted as inspectors will relieve them from the charge in this case. You have heard the views which I have given upon that. I think they are administrative officers. I charge you that they are administrative and ministerial officers in this respect, and that they are not judicial officers whose action protects them, and that therefore they are liable in this case. But, instead of doing as I did in the case this morning--directing a verdict--I submit the case to you with these instructions, and you can decide it here, or you may go out. Mr. VAN VOORHIS: I ask your honor to instruct the jury that if they find these inspectors acted honestly, in accordance with their best judgment, they should be acquitted. The COURT: I have expressly ruled to the contrary of that, gentlemen; that that makes no difference. Mr. VAN VOORHIS: And that in this country--under the laws of this country--The COURT: That is enough--you need not argue it, Mr. Van Voorhis. Mr. VAN VOORHIS: Then. I ask your honor to charge the jury that they must find the fact that these inspectors received the votes of these persons knowingly, and that such votes were votes for some person for member of Congress, there being in the case no evidence that any man was voted for, for member of Congress, and there being no evidence except that secret ballots were received; that the jury have a right to find for the defendants, if they choose. The COURT: I charge the jury that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the indictment upon this point. Mr. VAN VOORHIS: I ask your honor also to charge the jury that there is sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict of not guilty. The COURT: I can not charge that. Mr. VAN VOORHIS: Then why should it go to the jury? The COURT: As a matter of form. Mr. VAN VOORHIS: If the jury should find a verdict of not guilty, could your honor set it aside
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058  
1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
charge
 

VOORHIS

 

inspectors

 

evidence

 
officers
 

verdict

 
administrative
 

sufficient

 
guilty
 
received

country

 

member

 

Congress

 

sustain

 

morning

 
ladies
 
stands
 

difference

 

person

 
knowingly

Voorhis

 

offered

 

persons

 

matter

 

indictment

 

choose

 

defendants

 

ballots

 
secret
 
directing

submit

 
decide
 

instructions

 

liable

 

relieve

 

ministerial

 

respect

 
protects
 

action

 
judicial

judgment

 

repeat

 

accordance

 
honestly
 
acquitted
 

contrary

 

expressly

 

decision

 

question

 

exists