FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975  
976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   >>   >|  
s and judicial opinions, thus far, have been based on this purely partisan, time-serving opinion of General Bates, that the normal condition of the citizen of the United States is that of disfranchisement. That only such classes of citizens as have had special legislative guarantee have a legal right to vote. And if this decision of Attorney-General Bates was infamous, as against black men, but yesterday plantation slaves, what shall we pronounce upon Judge Bingham, in the House of Representatives, and Carpenter, in the Senate of the United States, for citing it against the women of the entire nation, vast numbers of whom are the peers of those honorable gentlemen themselves, in morals, intellect, culture, wealth, family--paying taxes on large estates, and contributing equally with them and their sex, in every direction, to the growth, prosperity, and well-being of the Republic? And what shall be said of the judicial opinions of Judges Cartter, Jameson, McKay, and Sharswood, all based upon this aristocratic monarchical idea, of the right of one class to govern another? I am proud to mention the names of the two United States judges who have given opinions honorable to our Republican idea, and honorable to themselves--Judge Howe, of Wyoming Territory, and Judge Underwood, of Virginia. The former gave it as his opinion a year ago, when the Legislature seemed likely to revoke the law enfranchising the women of that Territory, that, in case they succeeded, the women would still possess the right to vote under the XIV. Amendment. Judge Underwood, of Virginia, in noticing the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, denying to women the right to vote, under the XIV. Amendment, says: If the people of the United States, by amendment of their Constitution, could expunge, without any explanatory or assisting legislation, an adjective of five letters from all State constitutions, and thereby raise millions of our most ignorant fellow-citizens to all the rights and privileges of electors, why should not the same people, by the same Amendment, expunge an adjective of four letters from the same State constitutions, and thereby raise other millions of more educated and better info
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975  
976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

United

 

States

 

Amendment

 

opinions

 

honorable

 

decision

 

letters

 

adjective

 

Territory

 
Virginia

Underwood

 
people
 
expunge
 

judicial

 
opinion
 

General

 

millions

 

constitutions

 
citizens
 

Legislature


enfranchising

 

revoke

 

educated

 
judges
 
mention
 

succeeded

 

Wyoming

 

Republican

 

ignorant

 

fellow


rights

 
privileges
 

Constitution

 

legislation

 

assisting

 

explanatory

 

amendment

 

electors

 
noticing
 

recent


Supreme
 
possess
 

District

 

denying

 

Columbia

 

prosperity

 

yesterday

 
infamous
 

Attorney

 
plantation