FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912  
913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   >>   >|  
f construction is: Let the weak have the benefit of a doubt without defeating the general object of a law. Let mercy prevail, if there be real doubt. (Lieber's Hermeneutics, p. 144.) Now, if mercy must prevail when there is real doubt, still more should justice prevail if there is any doubt. If your honors have any doubt in regard to this decision, I call upon you, not in the name of mercy, but in the name of justice, to give us the benefit of that doubt, and to recognize the right of all human beings to govern themselves. * * * * * Chief Justice Cartter then delivered the opinion of the court, sustaining the demurrer, which is as follows: These cases, involving the same questions, are presented together. As shown by the plaintiffs' brief, the plaintiffs claim the elective franchise under the first section of the XIV. Amendment of the Constitution. The fourth paragraph of the regulations of the Governor and Judges of the District, made registration a condition precedent to the right of voting at the election of April 20th, 1871. The plaintiffs, being otherwise qualified, offered to register, and were refused. They then tendered their ballots at the polls, with evidence of qualification and offer to register, etc., when their ballots were rejected under the seventh section of the act providing a government for the District of Columbia. Mrs. Spencer brings her suit for this refusal of registration, and Mrs. Webster for the rejection of her vote, under the second and third sections of the act of May 31, 1870. The seventh section of the organic act above referred to, limits the right to vote to "all male citizens," but it is contended that in the presence of the XIV. Amendment, the word male is without effect, and the act authorizes "all citizens" to exercise the elective franchise. The question involved in the two actions which have been argued, and which, for the purposes of judgment, may be regarded as one, is, whether the plaintiffs have a right to exercise within this jurisdiction, the elective franchise. The letter of the law controlling the subject is to be found in the seventh section of the act of February 21, 1871, entitled, "An Act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,"
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912  
913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
plaintiffs
 

section

 

franchise

 

elective

 
District
 

seventh

 
prevail
 

ballots

 
Columbia
 
exercise

citizens

 

government

 

registration

 

register

 

Amendment

 
justice
 
benefit
 

rejection

 

refusal

 
Webster

organic

 

sections

 

Spencer

 

evidence

 

qualification

 

Lieber

 

defeating

 

general

 
object
 
rejected

providing

 
brings
 

referred

 

jurisdiction

 

letter

 

regarded

 

controlling

 
subject
 

provide

 
entitled

February

 

judgment

 

purposes

 
presence
 
effect
 

contended

 

limits

 

construction

 

authorizes

 

argued