FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  
difications which have in each case been due to one of the three main desires above specified, namely, reproduction, subsistence, and self-defence. Lamarck concludes the chapter with some passages which show that he was alive--as what Frenchman could fail to be after Buffon had written?--to the consequences which must follow from the geometrical ratio of increase, and to the struggle for existence, with consequent survival of the fittest, which must always be one of the conditions of any wild animal's existence. The paragraphs, indeed, on this subject are taken with very little alteration from Buffon's work. As Lamarck's theory is based upon the fact that it is on the nature of these conditions that the habits and consequently the structure of any animal will depend, he must have seen that the shape of many of its organs must vary greatly in correlation to the conditions to which it was subjected in the matter of self-protection. I do not see, then, that there is any substantial difference between the positions taken by Dr. Erasmus Darwin and by Lamarck in this respect. "Let us conclude," he writes, "by showing the means employed by nature to prevent the number of her creatures from injuring the conservation of what has been produced already, and of the general order which should subsist.[248] . . . . . . "In consequence of the extremely rapid rate of increase of the smaller, and especially of the most imperfect, animals, their numbers would become so great as to prove injurious to the conservation of breeds, and to the progress already made towards more perfect organization, unless nature had taken precautions to keep them down within certain fixed limits which she cannot exceed."[249] This seems to contain, and in a nutshell, as much of the essence of what Mr. Herbert Spencer and Mr. Charles Darwin have termed the survival of the fittest in the struggle for existence, as was necessary for Lamarck's purpose. To Lamarck, as to Dr. Darwin and Buffon, it was perfectly clear that the facts, that animals have to find their food under varying circumstances, and that they must defend themselves in all manner of varying ways against other creatures which would eat them if they could, were simply some of the conditions of their existence. In saying that the surrounding circumstances--which amount to the conditions of existence--determined the direction in which any plant or animal should be slowly modified, L
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
existence
 

Lamarck

 
conditions
 

animal

 
nature
 

Buffon

 

Darwin

 
varying
 

circumstances

 

survival


struggle
 

fittest

 

increase

 

creatures

 

conservation

 
animals
 

organization

 
perfect
 
limits
 

subsist


precautions

 

breeds

 

smaller

 

imperfect

 

numbers

 

injurious

 

progress

 

consequence

 

extremely

 

defend


manner
 

simply

 

slowly

 
modified
 

direction

 

surrounding

 

amount

 

determined

 
nutshell
 
essence

exceed

 

Herbert

 
Spencer
 

perfectly

 

purpose

 

Charles

 

termed

 

paragraphs

 

consequent

 

consequences