FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   >>   >|  
arck, whose disciple Mr. Spencer would appear to be,[345] admits "a certain peculiar, but limited power of response and adaptation in each animal and plant"--to the conditions of their existence. "Such theories," says Mr. Mivart, "have not to contend against the difficulty proposed, and it has been urged that even very complex extremely similar structures have again and again been developed quite independently one of the other, and this because the process has taken place not by merely haphazard, indefinite variations in all directions, but by the concurrence of some other internal natural law or laws co-operating with external influences and with Natural Selection in the evolution of organic forms. "_It must never be forgotten that to admit any such constant operation of any such unknown natural cause is to deny the purely Darwinian theory which relies upon the survival of the fittest by means of minute fortuitous indefinite variations._ "Among many other obligations which the author has to acknowledge to Professor Huxley, are the pointing out of this very difficulty, and the calling his attention to the striking resemblance between certain teeth of the dog, and of the thylacine, as one instance, and certain ornithic peculiarities of pterodactyles as another."[346] In brief then, changed distribution of use and disuse in consequence of changed conditions of the environment is with Lamarck the main cause of modification. According to Mr. Darwin natural selection, or the survival of favourable but accidental variations, is the most important means of modification. In a word, with Lamarck the variations are definite; with Mr. Darwin indefinite. FOOTNOTES: [333] Vol. ii. chap. i. [334] Vol. ii. chap, xxxiv., ed. 1872. [335] 'Philosophie Zoologique,' ed. M. Martins, Paris, Lyons, 1873, tom. i. p. 24. [336] 'Philosophie Zoologique,' tom. i. p. 72. [337] 'Origin of Species,' p. 3. [338] Ibid. p. 5. [339] 'Origin of Species,' p. 8. [340] Ibid. p. 9. [341] Ibid. p. 158. [342] Ibid. p. 159. [343] 'Origin of Species,' p. 4. [344] 'Genesis of Species,' p. 74, 1871. [345] See _ante_, p. 330, line 1 after heading. [346] 'Genesis of Species,' p. 76, ed. 1871. CHAPTER XX. NATURAL SELECTION CONSIDERED AS A MEANS OF MODIFICATION. THE CONFUSION WHICH THIS EXPRESSION OCCASIONS. When Mr. Darwin says that natural selection is the most important "means" of modification, I am not sure
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Species
 

natural

 
variations
 

indefinite

 
Darwin
 

modification

 

Origin

 
Genesis
 

important

 

Philosophie


Zoologique
 

survival

 

conditions

 

Lamarck

 

changed

 
difficulty
 

selection

 
favourable
 
Martins
 

definite


consequence

 

FOOTNOTES

 

environment

 

According

 

accidental

 

disuse

 

distribution

 

heading

 

CHAPTER

 

NATURAL


SELECTION
 

MODIFICATION

 

CONFUSION

 
CONSIDERED
 

OCCASIONS

 

EXPRESSION

 

author

 

developed

 
independently
 
structures

similar

 

complex

 
extremely
 

process

 

internal

 

concurrence

 

directions

 

haphazard

 

proposed

 

admits