FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192  
193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   >>   >|  
tres des moyens d'attaque."[204] Turning to the 'Botanic Garden' itself, I find that this admirable sentence belongs to M. Deleuze, and not to Dr. Darwin, who, however, has said what comes to much the same thing,[205] as may be seen p. 227 of this volume. But the authorship is immaterial; whether the passage was by Dr. Darwin or M. Deleuze, it was, in all probability, known to Lamarck before his change of front. * * * * * The note on Trapa Natans again[206] suggests itself as the source from which the passage in the 'Philosophie Zoologique' about the Ranunculus aquatilis is taken,[207] while one of the most important passages in the work, a summary, in fact, of the principal means of modification, seems to be taken, the first half of it from Buffon, and the second from Dr. Darwin. I have called attention to it on pp. 300, 301. We may then suppose that Lamarck failed to understand Buffon, and conceived that he ought either to have gone much farther, or not so far; not being yet prepared to go the whole length himself, he opposed mutability till Dr. Darwin's additions to Buffon's ostensible theory reached him, whereon he at once adopted them, and having received nothing but a few notes and hints, felt himself at liberty to work the theory out independently and claim it. In so original a work as the '_Philosophie Zoologique_' must always be considered, this may be legitimate, but I find in it, as Isidore Geoffroy seems also to have found, a little more claim to complete independence than is acceptable to one who is fresh from Buffon and Dr. Darwin. FOOTNOTES: [186] 'Hist. Nat. Gen.,' tom. ii. p. 404, 1859. [187] 'Systeme des Animaux sans Vertebres,' Paris, in-8, an. ix. (1801); 'Discours d'Ouverture,' p. 12, &c.; 'Recherches sur l'Organisation des Corps Vivants,' Paris, in-8, 1802, p. 50, &c.; 'Discours d'Ouverture d'un Cours de Zoologie pour l'an ix.,' Paris, in-8, 1803. This discourse is entirely devoted to the consideration of the question, "What is Species?" [188] 'Discours d'Ouverture d'un Cours de Zoologie,' 1806, Paris, in-8, p. 8, &c. [189] See following chapter. [190] 'Hist, des Anim. sans Verteb.,' tom, i., Introduction, 1^re ed., 1815; 'Syst. des Conn. Positives,' Paris, in-8, 1820, 1^re part, 2^me sect. ch. ii. p. 114, &c. [191] 'Hist. Nat. Gen.,' tom. ii. p. 407. [192] 'History of Creation,' English translation, vol. i. pp. 111, 112. [193] M. Martins' edition
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192  
193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Darwin
 

Buffon

 
Discours
 

Ouverture

 
Lamarck
 

Zoologie

 

Philosophie

 
Zoologique
 

theory

 

Deleuze


passage
 

Isidore

 

Geoffroy

 

legitimate

 

original

 
Recherches
 

considered

 
acceptable
 
Vertebres
 

FOOTNOTES


Animaux

 

independence

 

complete

 

Systeme

 

consideration

 

Positives

 

Martins

 

edition

 

History

 

Creation


English
 

translation

 

discourse

 
devoted
 

question

 

Vivants

 

Species

 

Verteb

 
Introduction
 
chapter

Organisation

 

opposed

 
change
 

probability

 

Natans

 

aquatilis

 

important

 

Ranunculus

 

suggests

 

source