FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>  
Lee. 5 vols. Oxford, 1905. 3. GLOSSARIES, GRAMMARS, ETC. The standard concordance is Bartlett's _New and Complete Concordance_, 1894. The standard dictionary and one of the great monuments of Shakespeare scholarship is Alexander Schmidt's _Shakespeare-Lexikon_. 2 vols. Berlin, 1894, 1895. 3d ed., 1902. This contains valuable appendices on syntax. The most recent brief glossary is C. T. Onion's _Shakespeare Glossary_. Oxford, 1911. It makes partial use of the valuable material in the New English Dictionary. The best grammar in English, though now somewhat out of date, is F. A. Abbott's _Shakespearian Grammar_, 1869, often reprinted. The following are also of value: Cunliffe, R. J. A New Shakespearean Dictionary. 1910. Dyce, A. A Glossary to the Works of Shakespeare. 1867. Revised by H. Littledale, 1902. Ellis, A. J. On Early English Pronunciation, with especial reference to Shakspere and Chaucer. 5 parts. E. E. T. S., 1869-1889. Franz, W. Shakespeare-Grammatik. 2 parts. Halle, 1898-1900. 2d ed., Heidelberg, 1905. No English translation. Vietor, W. A Shakespeare Phonology, Marburg and London, 1906. CHAPTER VIII QUESTIONS OF AUTHENTICITY 1. THE DOUBTFUL PLAYS The Shakespeare Apocrypha. Ed. C. F. T. Brooke. Oxford, 1908. This contains texts of fourteen of the plays discussed in this chapter. Pseudo-Shakespearean Plays. Ed. K. Warnke and L. Proescholdt. 5 vols. Halle, 1883, 1888. Contains only 5 plays. The Two Noble Kinsmen. Ed. H. Littledale. New Shaks. Soc. Publ., 1876. Doubtful Plays of William Shakespeare. Ed. M. Moltke. Leipsig, 1869. Contains 6 plays. A good bibliography for the critical matter on these plays is to be found in the Cambridge History of English Literature, vol. v, pp. 442-444. As to Cardenio, connected with Double Falsehood, see Bradford, G., Jr., Mod. Lang. Notes, February, 1910. 2. FORGERIES Ingleby, C. M. The Shakespeare Fabrications. 1859. A complete review of the Collier forgeries, with bibliography. Ireland, W. H. Confessions containing the particulars of his fabrication of the Shakespeare manuscripts. 1808. Malone, E. Inquiry into the Authenticity (of the Ireland Ms.). 1796. Law, E. Some Supposed Shakespeare Forgeries. 1911. Wheatley, H. B. Notes on the life of John Payne Collier. 1884. Gives a list and account of the spurious documents. 3. THE BACON CONTROVERSY Allen, C. Notes on the Bacon-Shakespeare question. Boston, 1900. An ac
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 
English
 

Oxford

 

bibliography

 

Ireland

 

valuable

 

Collier

 

Dictionary

 
Glossary
 
Contains

standard

 

Littledale

 
Shakespearean
 

Literature

 

Falsehood

 
Double
 

Cardenio

 

connected

 

Leipsig

 
Kinsmen

Proescholdt

 

Doubtful

 
matter
 

Cambridge

 

critical

 

William

 

Moltke

 

History

 
forgeries
 
Wheatley

Supposed

 

Forgeries

 

question

 

Boston

 

CONTROVERSY

 

account

 

spurious

 

documents

 

Ingleby

 

FORGERIES


Fabrications

 

complete

 

February

 
Bradford
 

review

 

Warnke

 
Malone
 
Inquiry
 

Authenticity

 

manuscripts