FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   >>  
question of danger or expedience. 3. As to Johnson's case of a murderer asking you which way a man had gone, I should have anticipated that, had such a difficulty happened to him, his first act would have been to knock the man down, and to call out for the police; and next, if he was worsted in the conflict, he would not have given the ruffian the information he asked, at whatever risk to himself. I think he would have let himself be killed first. I do not think that he would have told a lie. 4. A secret is a more difficult case. Supposing something has been confided to me in the strictest secrecy, which could not be revealed without great disadvantage to another, what am I to do? If I am a lawyer, I am protected by my profession. I have a right to treat with extreme indignation any question which trenches on the inviolability of my position; but, supposing I was driven up into a corner, I think I should have a right to say an untruth, or that, under such circumstances, a lie would be _material_, but it is almost an impossible case, for the law would defend me. In like manner, as a priest, I should think it lawful to speak as if I knew nothing of what passed in confession. And I think in these cases, I do in fact possess that guarantee, that I am not going by private judgment, which just now I demanded; for society would bear me out, whether as a lawyer or as a priest, that I had a duty to my client or penitent, such, that an untruth in the matter was not a lie. A common type of this permissible denial, be it _material lie_ or _evasion_, is at the moment supplied to me: an artist asked a Prime Minister, who was sitting to him, "What news, my Lord, from France?" He answered, "_I do not know_; I have not read the Papers." 5. A more difficult question is, when to accept confidence has not been a duty. Supposing a man wishes to keep the secret that he is the author of a book, and he is plainly asked on the subject. Here I should ask the previous question, whether any one has a right to publish what he dare not avow. It requires to have traced the bearings and results of such a principle, before being sure of it; but certainly, for myself, I am no friend of strictly anonymous writing. Next, supposing another has confided to you the secret of his authorship: there are persons who would have no scruple at all in giving a denial to impertinent questions asked them on the subject. I have heard a great man in his day at Ox
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   >>  



Top keywords:

question

 

secret

 

material

 
untruth
 

confided

 

Supposing

 

supposing

 

subject

 

lawyer

 
difficult

denial

 
priest
 
penitent
 

client

 
matter
 

answered

 

common

 

Minister

 
society
 
giving

Papers

 
moment
 

sitting

 

supplied

 
permissible
 

artist

 

France

 
evasion
 

authorship

 

results


principle

 

questions

 

bearings

 

impertinent

 

requires

 

persons

 

traced

 

friend

 

strictly

 

plainly


scruple

 

writing

 
author
 

confidence

 

wishes

 

anonymous

 

demanded

 
previous
 

publish

 

accept