FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179  
180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   >>   >|  
ne, and illustrates in a beautiful manner their progress in opposite directions, parallel to the electric current, which is for the time giving a uniform general direction to their mutual affinities (524.). 542. According to my theory, an element or a substance not decomposable under the circumstances of the experiment, (as for instance, a dilute acid or alkali,) should not be transferred, or pass from pole to pole, unless it be in chemical relation to some other element or substance tending to pass in the opposite direction, for the effect is considered as essentially due to the mutual relation of such particles. But the theories attributing the determination of the elements to the attractions and repulsions of the poles require no such condition, i.e. there is no reason apparent why the attraction of the positive pole, and the repulsion of the negative pole, upon a particle of free acid, placed in water between them, should not (with equal currents of electricity) be as strong as if that particle were previously combined with alkali; but, on the contrary, as they have not a powerful chemical affinity to overcome, there is every reason to suppose they would be stronger, and would sooner bring the acid to rest at the positive pole[A]. Yet such is not the case, as has been shown by the experiments on free and combined acid (526. 528.). [A] Even Sir Humphry Davy considered the attraction of the pole as being communicated from one particle to another of the _same_ kind (483.). 543. Neither does M. de la Rive's theory, as I understand it, _require_ that the particles should be in combination: it does not even admit, where there are two sets of particles capable of combining with and passing by each other, that they do combine, but supposes that they travel as separate compounds of matter and electricity. Yet in fact the free substance _cannot_ travel, the combined one _can_. 544. It is very difficult to find cases amongst solutions or fluids which shall illustrate this point, because of the difficulty of finding two fluids which shall conduct, shall not mingle, and in which an element evolved from one shall not find a combinable element in the other. _Solutions_ of acids or alkalies will not answer, because they exist by virtue of an attraction; and increasing the solubility of a body in one direction, and diminishing it in the opposite, is just as good a reason for transfer, as modifying the affinity between t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179  
180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
element
 

substance

 

particle

 

attraction

 

particles

 

reason

 

combined

 
direction
 

opposite

 
electricity

require

 

positive

 

affinity

 

fluids

 

travel

 
considered
 

alkali

 
chemical
 

theory

 

mutual


relation

 
capable
 

combining

 

matter

 

passing

 

compounds

 

circumstances

 
supposes
 

separate

 

combine


Neither
 

experiment

 
illustrates
 

combination

 

understand

 

answer

 

virtue

 

alkalies

 

combinable

 

Solutions


increasing

 

solubility

 

transfer

 
modifying
 
diminishing
 

evolved

 
mingle
 

difficult

 

communicated

 

solutions