FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2359   2360   2361   2362   2363   2364   2365   2366   2367   2368   2369   2370   2371   2372   2373   2374   2375   2376   2377   2378   2379   2380   2381   2382   2383  
2384   2385   2386   2387   2388   2389   2390   2391   2392   2393   2394   2395   2396   2397   2398   2399   2400   2401   2402   2403   2404   2405   2406   2407   2408   >>   >|  
ey's Gram._, p. 14. How hard this author laboured to _think what number is_, and could not! (19.) "Number is the distinction of _unity and plurality_."--_Hart's E. Gram._, p. 40, Why say, "_distinction_;" the numbers, or _distinctions_, being two? (20.) "Number is _the capacity of nouns_ to represent either one or more than one object."--_Barrett's Revised Gram._, p. 40. (21.) "Number is _a property_ of _the noun which_ denotes _one_ or _more_ than one."--_Weld's Gram._, 2d Ed., p. 55. (22.) "Number is _a property_ of the _noun or pronoun_ [,] _by which it_ denotes _one, or more_ than one."--_Weld's Gram., Abridged Ed._, p. 49. (23.) "Number is _the property_ that distinguishes _one from more_ than one."--_Weld's Gram., Improved Ed._, p. 60. This, of course, excludes the plural. (24.) "Number is _a modification of nouns_ to denote whether one object is meant, or more than one."--_Butler's Gram._, p. 19. (25.) "Number is _that modification_ of the _Noun_ which distinguishes one from more than one."--_Spencer's Gram._, p. 26. Now, it is plain, that not one of these twenty-five definitions comports with the idea that the singular is one number and the plural an other! Not one of them exhibits any tolerable approach to accuracy, either of thought or of expression! Many of the grammarians have not attempted any definition of _number_, or of _the numbers_, though they speak of both the singular and the plural, and perhaps sometimes apply the term _number_ to _the distinction_ which is _in each_: for it is the property of the singular number, to distinguish unity from plurality: and of the plural, to distinguish plurality from unity. Among the authors who are thus silent, are Lily, Colet, Brightland, Harris, Lowth, Ash, Priestly, Bicknell, Adam, Gould, Harrison, Comly, Jaudon, Webster, Webber, Churchill, Staniford, Lennie, Dalton, Blair, Cobbett, Cobb, A. Flint, Felch, Guy, Hall, and S. W. Clark. Adam and Gould, however, in explaining the properties of _verbs_, say: "_Number_ marks _how many_ we suppose to be, to act, or to suffer."--_A._, 80; _G._, 78. [71] These are the parts of speech in some late grammars; as, Barrett's, of 1854, Butler's, Covell's, Day's, Frazee's, Fowle's New, Spear's, Weld's, Wells's, and the Well-wishers'. In Frost's Practical Grammar, the words of the language are said to be "divided into _eight_ classes," and the names are given thus: "_Noun, Article, Pronoun, Verb, Adverb, Preposition, Conjunction, a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2359   2360   2361   2362   2363   2364   2365   2366   2367   2368   2369   2370   2371   2372   2373   2374   2375   2376   2377   2378   2379   2380   2381   2382   2383  
2384   2385   2386   2387   2388   2389   2390   2391   2392   2393   2394   2395   2396   2397   2398   2399   2400   2401   2402   2403   2404   2405   2406   2407   2408   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Number
 

number

 

plural

 
property
 

plurality

 
singular
 

distinction

 

Barrett

 

Butler

 

distinguishes


denotes

 
modification
 

object

 

numbers

 

distinguish

 

Harris

 

explaining

 

Bicknell

 

properties

 
Priestly

Webber

 

Webster

 
Jaudon
 

Dalton

 

Lennie

 

Staniford

 

Churchill

 
suppose
 

Harrison

 
Cobbett

Brightland

 

language

 

divided

 

Grammar

 
Practical
 

wishers

 

Adverb

 
Preposition
 

Conjunction

 

Pronoun


Article

 
classes
 

speech

 

suffer

 

grammars

 

Frazee

 

Covell

 

expression

 

Abridged

 

pronoun