FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681  
682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   >>   >|  
published in 1800. He then taught: "We have no _passive_ verb in the language; and those which are called _neuter_ are mostly _active_."--Page 14. But subsequently, in his Philosophical, Abridged, and Improved Grammars, he recognized "a more natural and comprehensive division" of verbs, "_transitive, intransitive, and passive_."--_Webster's Rudiments_, p. 20. This, in reality, differs but little from the old division into _active, passive_, and _neuter_. In some grammars of recent date, as Churchill's, R. W. Bailey's, J. R. Brown's, Butler's, S. W. Clark's, Frazee's, Hart's, Hendrick's, Perley's, Pinneo's, Weld's, Wells's, Mulligan's, and the _improved_ treatises of Bullions and Frost, verbs are said to be of _two_ kinds only, _transitive_ and _intransitive_; but these authors allow to transitive verbs a "passive form," or "passive voice,"--absurdly making all passive verbs transitive, and all neuters intransitive, as if _action_ were expressed by both. For this most faulty classification, Dr. Bullions pretends the authority of "Mr. Webster;" and Frazee, that of "Webster, Bullions, and others."--_Frazee's Gram._, Ster. Ed., p. 30. But if Dr. Webster ever taught the absurd doctrine _that passive verbs are transitive_, he has contradicted it far too much to have any weight in its favour. OBS. 11.--Dalton makes only two classes; and these he will have to be _active_ and _passive_: an arrangement for which he might have quoted Scaliger, Sanctius, and Scioppius. Ash and Coar recognize but two, which they call _active_ and _neuter_. This was also the scheme of Bullions, in his Principles of E. Gram., 4th Edition, 1842. Priestley and Maunder have two, which they call _transitive_ and _neuter_; but Maunder, like some named above, will have transitive verbs to be susceptible of an active and a passive voice, and Priestley virtually asserts the same. Cooper, Day, Davis, Hazen, Hiley, Webster, Wells, (in his 1st Edition,) and Wilcox. have three classes; _transitive, intransitive_, and _passive_. Sanders's Grammar has _three_; "_Transitive, Intransitive_, and _Neuter_;" and two voices, both _transitive!_ Jaudon has four: _transitive, intransitive, auxiliary_, and _passive_. Burn has four; _active, passive, neuter_, and _substantive_. Cardell labours hard to prove that all verbs are _both active and transitive_; and for this, had he desired their aid, he might have cited several ancient authorities.[227] Cutler avers, "_All verbs ar
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681  
682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
passive
 

transitive

 

active

 

neuter

 

Webster

 

intransitive

 
Bullions
 
Frazee
 

Maunder

 
Priestley

Edition

 

taught

 
classes
 

division

 

Sanctius

 

Scaliger

 

weight

 

Dalton

 
Principles
 
scheme

recognize

 

quoted

 
Scioppius
 
arrangement
 

favour

 

desired

 

labours

 
Cardell
 

Jaudon

 

auxiliary


substantive

 

Cutler

 

authorities

 

ancient

 
voices
 

Neuter

 
susceptible
 

virtually

 
asserts
 

Cooper


Sanders

 

Grammar

 

Transitive

 
Intransitive
 

Wilcox

 

expressed

 

differs

 

reality

 

natural

 
comprehensive