FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>  
wrong, philosophers; thirdly, because those who reason on many subjects, and who are the first to reason on them, are liable to be deceived. Q. If the law of nature be not written, must it not become arbitrary and ideal? A. No: because it consists entirely in facts, the demonstration of which can be incessantly renewed to the senses, and constitutes a science as accurate and precise as geometry and mathematics; and it is because the law of nature forms an exact science, that men, born ignorant and living inattentive and heedless, have had hitherto only a superficial knowledge of it. CHAPTER III. PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF NATURE RELATING TO MAN. Q. Explain the principles of the law of nature with relation to man. A. They are simple; all of them are comprised in one fundamental and single precept. Q. What is that precept? A. It is self-preservation. Q. Is not happiness also a precept of the law of nature? A. Yes: but as happiness is an accidental state, resulting only from the development of man's faculties and his social system, it is not the immediate and direct object of nature; it is in some measure, a superfluity annexed to the necessary and fundamental object of preservation. Q. How does nature order man to preserve himself? A. By two powerful and involuntary sensations, which it has attached, as two guides, two guardian Geniuses to all his actions: the one a sensation of pain, by which it admonishes him of, and deters him from, everything that tends to destroy him; the other, a sensation of pleasure, by which it attracts and carries him towards everything that tends to his preservation and the development of his existence. Q. Pleasure, then, is not an evil, a sin, as casuists pretend? A. No, only inasmuch as it tends to destroy life and health which, by the avowal of those same casuists, we derive from God himself. Q. Is pleasure the principal object of our existence, as some philosophers have asserted? A. No; not more than pain; pleasure is an incitement to live as pain is a repulsion from death. Q. How do you prove this assertion? A. By two palpable facts: One, that pleasure, when taken immoderately, leads to destruction; for instance, a man who abuses the pleasure of eating or drinking, attacks his health, and injures his life. The other, that pain sometimes leads to self-preservation; for instance, a man who permits a mortified member to be cut off, suffers pain i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>  



Top keywords:

nature

 

pleasure

 
preservation
 

object

 

precept

 

existence

 

casuists

 

fundamental

 

happiness

 
destroy

health
 

development

 

reason

 
philosophers
 
instance
 

science

 

sensation

 
Geniuses
 

guardian

 
Pleasure

admonishes

 
deters
 
guides
 

involuntary

 

carries

 

attracts

 
sensations
 

actions

 

attached

 
incitement

abuses
 

eating

 

drinking

 

destruction

 

immoderately

 

attacks

 

injures

 

suffers

 

member

 
mortified

permits
 
palpable
 

assertion

 

derive

 

principal

 
pretend
 

avowal

 

asserted

 

repulsion

 

powerful