FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
is a delusion (or at least, in the last resort, a negligible element) and that man is but one of the many phenomena or facts of a physical universe--then we may continue, indeed, as some evolutionary and naturalistic thinkers do, to speak of a science of Ethics, but such a science will not be a study of the moral life as we understand it and have defined it. Ethics, therefore, while dependent upon the philosophical sciences, has its own distinct content and scope. The end of life, that for which a man should live, with all its implications, forms the subject of moral inquiry. It is {21} concerned not merely with what a man is or actually does, but more specifically with what he should be and should do. Hence, as we have seen, the word 'ought' is the most distinctive term of Ethics involving a consideration of values and a relation of the actual and the ideal. The 'ought' of life constitutes at once the purpose, law, and reason of conduct. It proposes the three great questions involved in all ethical inquiry--whither? how? and why? and determines the three great words which are constantly recurring in every ethical system--end, norm, motive. Moral good is the moral end considered as realised. The moral norm or rule impelling the will to the realisation of this end is called Duty. The moral motive considered as an acquired power of the acting will is called Virtue.[11] [1] Cf. Mackenzie, _Manual of Ethics_, p. 32; also Wuttke, _Christian Ethics_ (Eng. Trans.), vol. i. p. 14. [2] _Metaph. of Morals_, sect. i. [3] Mackenzie, _Manual of Ethics_, p. 8. See also Muirhead, _Elements of Ethics_. [4] Hyslop, _Elements of Ethics_, p. 1. [5] Schiller, _Ueber Anmuth und Wuerde_. Cf. also Ruskin, _Mod. Painters_, vol. ii.; Seeley, _Natural Religion_, and Inge, _Faith and its Psychology_, p. 203 ff. See also Bosanquet _Hist. of Aesthetic_. We are indebted to _Romanticism_, and especially to Novalis in Germany and Cousin in France for the thought that the good and the beautiful meet and amalgamate in God. [6] Browning. [7] Cf. Newman Smyth, _Christian Ethics_, p. 8. [8] See Author's _History of Philosophy_, p. 585. [9] Introduction to Hume's _Works_. [10] Mackenzie seems to imply this view. _Ethics_, p. 25. [11] Cf. Haering, _Ethics of the Christian Life_, p. 9. {22} CHAPTER II THE POSTULATES OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS We now proceed to define Christian Ethics and to investigate the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ethics

 

Christian

 

Mackenzie

 

motive

 

inquiry

 

ethical

 
Elements
 

considered

 
called
 
science

Manual

 
Hyslop
 
Painters
 

Seeley

 
Wuerde
 

Anmuth

 
Schiller
 

Ruskin

 
proceed
 

Wuttke


define

 
investigate
 

ETHICS

 

Muirhead

 

Natural

 

Metaph

 

Morals

 

Aesthetic

 

Philosophy

 

POSTULATES


History

 

Author

 

Browning

 
Newman
 
Introduction
 

CHAPTER

 

Haering

 

indebted

 

Romanticism

 

Bosanquet


Psychology

 

Novalis

 
beautiful
 

amalgamate

 
CHRISTIAN
 
thought
 

Germany

 
Cousin
 
France
 

Religion