FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170  
171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   >>   >|  
lack of development. It has at last entered upon a new era of industrial activity, and is now making rapid strides toward a stage of material prosperity commensurate with its great natural wealth.--_New York Herald_, September 12,1883. Now, here is quite a remarkable fact to which I wish to call your attention, to show you the opportunities for labor existing in the South and what is the condition of certain counties in the South. I hold in my hand a book that is compiled for the benefit of the Georgia Pacific Railroad, but I happened to find it in my room and thought these matters would be interesting. Q. The data you consider reliable? --A. What I read I think comes from the census report; I think this is reliable: In this connection let us glance at Montgomery County, Alabama, which, although not in the belt we are studying, is on the same prairie formation crossed by the Georgia Pacific Railway, on the edge of Mississippi. Compare it with Butler County, Ohio, which "shows the best record of any county in the West." In live stock Montgomery has $1,748,273; Butler, $1,333,592. That is the largest producing county in Ohio as compared with Montgomery County, Alabama, before the war. Montgomery had 63,134 hogs; Butler, 51,640. Animals slaughtered: Montgomery, $336,915; Butler, $318,274. In grain Butler was considerably ahead, but in roots Montgomery led. Montgomery doubled Butler in the production of wool, and had its cotton crop to show besides. The total value of the crops of Montgomery County was $3,264,170; those of Butler only $1,671,132. There is Montgomery County, Alabama, compared with the leading producing county in Ohio. Q. Do you know as to the relative size of the two counties? --A. I think it was given here: A handsome triumph for the Alabama county! And yet Montgomery is not up to the average of the prairie counties of Alabama. I do not know the relative size. Here is a fact to which I wish to call particular attention: We have examined the mortality tables of the United States census for 1880, and find that as regards health, Georgia, Alabama, and Mississ
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170  
171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Montgomery
 

Butler

 

Alabama

 

County

 

county

 
Georgia
 
counties
 

producing

 

prairie

 
Pacific

reliable

 

census

 
attention
 

compared

 

relative

 
health
 

examined

 
Mississ
 

slaughtered

 
Animals

mortality

 

States

 

United

 
tables
 
largest
 

average

 

triumph

 
leading
 
handsome
 

considerably


doubled

 
cotton
 

production

 

glance

 
September
 

Herald

 

natural

 

wealth

 

condition

 
existing

remarkable

 
opportunities
 

commensurate

 

entered

 

development

 

industrial

 

activity

 

material

 

prosperity

 
strides