FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>  
aracters of its several terms, but breaks up into a number of sections, in each of which the several terms present analogies with the corresponding terms of the other series. Thus the whole series does not run: _a, b, d, e, f, g, h, i, k,_ &c., but _a, b, c, d_, A, B, C, D, alpha, beta, gamma, delta, &c.; so that it is said to express a _periodic law_ of recurrent similarities. Or the relation may be expressed in another way. In each section of the series, the atomic weight is greater than in the preceding section, so that if _w_ is the atomic weight of any element in the first segment, _w+x_ will represent the atomic weight of any element in the next, and _w+x+y_ the atomic weight of any element in the next, and so on. Therefore the sections may be represented as parallel series, the corresponding terms of which have analogous properties; each successive series starting with a body the atomic weight of which is greater than that of any in the preceding series, in the following fashion: _d_ D delta _c_ C gamma _b_ B beta _a_ A alpha - ----- --------- _w_ _w + x_ _w + x + y_ [Sidenote: The possibility of a primary form of matter.] This is a conception with, which biologists are very familiar, animal and plant groups constantly appearing as series of parallel modifications of similar and yet different primary forms. In the living world, facts of this kind are now understood to mean evolution from a common prototype. It is difficult to imagine that in the not-living world they are devoid of significance. Is it not possible, nay probable that they may mean the evolution of our 'elements' from a primary undifferentiated form of matter? Fifty years ago, such a suggestion would have been scouted as a revival of the dreams of the alchemists. At present, it may be said to be the burning question of physico-chemical science. In fact, the so-called 'vortex-ring' hypothesis is a very serious and remarkable attempt to deal with material units from a point of view which is consistent with the doctrine of evolution. It supposes the ether to be a uniform substance, and that the 'elementary' units are, broadly speaking, permanent whirlpools, or vortices, of this ether, the properties of which depend on their actual and potential modes of motion. It is curious and highly interesting to remark that this hypothesis reminds us not only of the sp
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>  



Top keywords:
series
 

atomic

 

weight

 

evolution

 
element
 
primary
 

sections

 
preceding
 

present

 

greater


living

 

matter

 
parallel
 

properties

 
hypothesis
 
section
 

scouted

 

physico

 
chemical
 

revival


dreams

 

alchemists

 

question

 
burning
 

probable

 
devoid
 

significance

 

reminds

 

elements

 

undifferentiated


suggestion

 

vortex

 
potential
 

substance

 

actual

 

motion

 
curious
 
uniform
 

depend

 

speaking


permanent

 

broadly

 

elementary

 

vortices

 
supposes
 

doctrine

 
remarkable
 

attempt

 
whirlpools
 

called