FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  
ay have participated against the United States, which Morocco can take cognizance of, or bring under the terms of any extradition treaty. I have the honour to be, &c., &c. (Signed) R. Semmes. John Hay Drummond Hay, C.B., H.M. Charge d'Affaires, Tangier, Marocco. On the 24th Mr. Hay replied, and the following extract from his communication will best explain the grounds he assumed:--"You," he writes, "must be aware that Her Britannic Majesty's Government have decided on observing a strict neutrality in the present conflict between the Northern and Southern States; it is therefore incumbent on Her Majesty's officers to avoid anything like undue interference in any questions affecting the interests of either party which do not concern the British government; and though I do not refuse to accede to your request to deliver the letter to the Moorish authorities, I think it my duty to signify distinctly to the latter my intention to abstain from expressing an opinion regarding the course to be pursued by Morocco on the subject matter of your letter." To this despatch Captain Semmes forthwith replied, and his letter is remarkable for the able manner in which the question of neutrality is dealt with. After thoroughly reviewing the transaction, he sums up as follows:-- "Upon further inquiry I learn that my first supposition that the two gentlemen in question had been arrested under some claim of extradition (unfortunately I have not a copy of the treaty between Morocco and the United States) was not exactly correct. It seems that they were arrested by Moorish soldiers upon the requisition of the United States Consul, who claimed to exercise jurisdiction over them as citizens of the United States, under a provision of a treaty common between what are called the non-civilized and the civilized nations. This state of facts does not alter in any degree the reasoning applicable to the case. If Morocco adopts the _status_ given the Confederate States by Europe, she must remain neutral between the two belligerents, not undertaking to judge of the nationality of the citizens of either of the belligerents, or to decide any other question growing out of the war which does not concern her own interests. She has no right, therefore, to adjudge a citizen of the Confederate States to be a citizen of the United States, and not having this right herself she cannot transfer it by treaty to the United States Consul." The comm
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

United

 

treaty

 
Morocco
 
question
 

letter

 

Moorish

 

Confederate

 
Consul
 

citizens


neutrality
 

concern

 

Majesty

 

civilized

 

replied

 

Semmes

 

extradition

 

citizen

 
arrested
 

belligerents


interests

 

requisition

 

claimed

 

reviewing

 

transaction

 

soldiers

 

supposition

 

gentlemen

 

correct

 

inquiry


growing

 

decide

 
nationality
 

remain

 

neutral

 

undertaking

 

transfer

 
adjudge
 
Europe
 

called


nations

 
common
 

jurisdiction

 

provision

 
adopts
 
status
 

applicable

 

reasoning

 

degree

 

exercise