FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   >>  
sted for women, the question is: "Will it benefit men?" Why We Oppose Votes for Men 1. Because man's place is the armory. 2. Because no really manly man wants to settle any question otherwise than by fighting about it. 3. Because if men should adopt peaceable methods women will no longer look up to them. 4. Because men will lose their charm if they step out of their natural sphere and interest themselves in other matters than feats of arms, uniforms and drums. 5. Because men are too emotional to vote. Their conduct at baseball games and political conventions shows this, while their innate tendency to appeal to force renders them peculiarly unfit for the task of government. The Logic of the Law In 1875 the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in denying the petition of women to practise before it said: "It would be shocking to man's reverence for womanhood and faith in woman ... that woman should be permitted to mix professionally in all the nastiness which finds its way into courts of justice." It then names thirteen subjects as unfit for the attention of women--three of them are crimes committed against women. Consistency ("Vile insults, lewd talk and brutal conduct were used by the indicted men to frighten respectable women who went to the polls in Terre Haute at the last election, asserted District Attorney Dailey."--_Press Dispatch_.) Are the polls unfit for decent women? No, sir, they are perfectly orderly. Tut, tut! Go there at once and swear and be brutal, or what will become of our anti-suffrage argument? Sometimes We're Ivy, and Sometimes We're Oak Is it true that the English government is calling on women to do work abandoned by men? Yes, it is true. Is not woman's place the home? No, not when men need her services outside the home. Will she never be told again that her place is the home? Oh, yes, indeed. When? As soon as men want their jobs back again. Do You Know That in 1869 Miss Jex-Blake and four other women entered for a medical degree at the University of Edinburgh? That the president of the College of Physicians refused to give the women the prizes they had won? That the undergraduates insulted any professor who allowed women to compete for prizes? That the women were stoned in the streets, and finally excluded from the medical school? That in 1877 the British Medical Association declared women ineli
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   >>  



Top keywords:
Because
 

brutal

 

medical

 
question
 

conduct

 
prizes
 

government

 

Sometimes

 

argument

 

English


abandoned

 
calling
 

decent

 

election

 

perfectly

 

orderly

 

asserted

 

Attorney

 

Dailey

 
Dispatch

District

 

suffrage

 
undergraduates
 

insulted

 

professor

 

allowed

 

president

 
Edinburgh
 

College

 
Physicians

refused

 

compete

 

stoned

 

Medical

 
British
 

Association

 

declared

 
school
 

streets

 

finally


excluded

 
University
 

degree

 

services

 

entered

 

uniforms

 

matters

 

natural

 

sphere

 

interest