FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293  
294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   >>  
s reference:-- ----An eye That met the gaze, or turn'd it knew not why. "Rosamund's Epistle." But, of course, he misquotes both line and title--though Southey would feel flattered in finding that his friend's memory had done so well. As the editors have not annotated the passage, I will say here that Lamb should have quoted The modest eye That met the glance, or turn'd, it knew not why. "Rosamund to Henry." The poem is one of those in the now scarce volume which Southey and Lovel published jointly at Bath in 1795, _Poems: containing "The Retrospect."_ [It was this forest passage which, as Hazlitt tells us in his _Spirit of the Age_, so puzzled Godwin. After looking in vain through the old dramatists for it, he applied to Lamb himself.] [Footnote 31: Sir Jacob Astley(?), but he too was ennobled _after_ Naseby.] By the end of October the play had evidently been completed (though not yet named), for on the 31st Southey was asked, "Have you seen it, or shall I lend you a copy? I want your opinion of it." None is recorded here, but more than two years later, when Southey was in London, he gave it to Danvers (_Letters of R.S._, II., 184): "Lamb and his sister see us often: he is printing his play, which will please you by the exquisite beauty of its poetry, and provoke you by the exquisite silliness of its story." The play must have been baptised as "Pride's Cure" soon after Hallowe'en, for at Christmas it was submitted under that title to Kemble, and about the same time (December 28, 1799) we find Lamb defending the title (with the vehemence and subtlety of a doubter, as I read) against the adverse criticism of Manning and Mrs. Charles Lloyd. Lamb had lately been on a visit to these friends at Cambridge, and had doubtless taken a copy of his play with him and received their objections there and then--for his defence does not seem to have been provoked by a letter. [In a letter to Charles Lloyd that has come to light since Mr. Dykes Campbell wrote, belonging to middle December, 1799, Lamb asks for his play to be returned to him, suggesting that Mrs. Lloyd shall despatch it. It was probably in the letter that accompanied the parcel that the criticism of the title was found. Lamb thus defended it:--"By-the-bye, I think you and Sophia both in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293  
294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   >>  



Top keywords:

Southey

 

letter

 

Charles

 
criticism
 
exquisite
 

December

 

Rosamund

 
passage
 

Christmas

 

Hallowe


belonging

 

accompanied

 

middle

 
Kemble
 

submitted

 

printing

 

Sophia

 
despatch
 

sister

 
beauty

returned

 
baptised
 

Campbell

 

poetry

 
provoke
 

silliness

 

received

 

objections

 

Cambridge

 

doubtless


provoked

 

defence

 

friends

 

subtlety

 
doubter
 

vehemence

 
defended
 
defending
 
parcel
 

adverse


Manning

 

suggesting

 

scarce

 
volume
 

published

 

glance

 

jointly

 
forest
 

Hazlitt

 
Spirit