FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  
fails, we may at least doubt whether it solves the one isolated case of the Great Bear among the Greeks and Romans. It must be observed that the philological explanation of Mr. Mueller does not clear up the Arcadian story of their own descent from a she-bear who is now a star. Yet similar stories of the descent of tribes from animals are so widespread that it would be difficult to name the race or the quarter of the globe where they are not found. Are they all derived from misunderstood words meaning 'bright'? These considerations appear to be a strong argument for comparing not only Aryan, but all attainable myths. We shall often find, if we take a wide view, that the philological explanation which seemed plausible in a single case is hopelessly narrow when applied to a large collection of parallel cases in language of various families. Finally, in dealing with star-myths, we adhere to the hypothesis of Mr. Tylor: 'From savagery up to civilisation,' Akkadian, Greek, or English, 'there may be traced in the mythology of the stars a course of thought, changed, indeed, in application, yet never broken in its evident connection from first to last. The savage sees individual stars as animate beings, or combines star-groups into living celestial creatures, or limbs of them, or objects connected with them; while at the other extremity of the scale of civilisation the modern astronomer keeps up just such ancient fancies, turning them to account in useful survival, as a means of mapping out the celestial globe.'[156] FOOTNOTES: [142] The attempt is not to explain the origin of each separate name, but only of the general habit of giving animal or human names to stars. [143] Mr. Herbert Spencer believes that the Australians were once more civilised than at present. But there has never been found a trace of pottery on the Australian continent, which says little for their civilisation in the past. [144] See C. O. Mueller (_Prolog. zur Mythol._, Engl. transl., p. 17): 'Callisto is just nothing else than Artemis and her sacred animal comprehended in one idea.' See also pp. 201-4. Mueller (C. O.) very nearly made the discovery that the gods of Greece may in some cases have a bestial ancestry. [145] Brugsch, _History of Egypt_, i. 32. [146] Brough Smyth. [147] _Amazonian Tortoise Myths_, p. 39. [148] Sahagun, vii. 3. [149] Grimm, _D. M._, Engl. transl., p. 716. [150] Hartt, _op. cit._, p. 40. For a modern sun
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

civilisation

 

Mueller

 

modern

 

animal

 

descent

 

philological

 

explanation

 

celestial

 
transl
 

civilised


Australian

 

continent

 

pottery

 

present

 

general

 

survival

 

mapping

 
FOOTNOTES
 

account

 

ancient


fancies
 

turning

 

attempt

 

Herbert

 

believes

 

Spencer

 

giving

 

origin

 

explain

 

separate


Australians

 

sacred

 

Amazonian

 
Tortoise
 

Brough

 
History
 

Sahagun

 

Brugsch

 

Artemis

 

astronomer


comprehended

 
Callisto
 
Prolog
 
Mythol
 

Greece

 

bestial

 
ancestry
 

discovery

 

connection

 

derived