FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184  
185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>   >|  
Porte to endeavour to put an end to an arrangement entered into at the suggestion, or at all events with the approval, of the Allies. It cannot be an object at this moment, when extraneous circumstances have probably acted favourably for us on the minds of the Emperor of Austria and his Government, to check that disposition, make them distrust us, and incline them to throw themselves towards Russia, who now will spare no efforts to gain them. Her Majesty sees by your proposed Despatch you do not expect the Austrians to comply with this demand. Even if they consented to diminish the numbers of their Troops, they would do so only to suit their own convenience, and such diminution would in no ways decrease the evils of the occupation. Lastly, the Queen is of opinion that if such a proposal is to be made, it ought not to be done through Lord Stratford and the Porte, but that the subject should be broached at Vienna and the Austrian Government asked what their intentions are; that this would be the more friendly, more open, and more dignified course, and more likely than the other plan of being successful. Her Majesty, however, doubts that any such demand will be acceded to by the Austrians, and believes that their refusal will put the Allies in an awkward position. This is, I believe, the pith of Her Majesty's opinions--there appears to me to be much sense in them--and they are well deserving of your and Palmerston's consideration. Yours sincerely, GRANVILLE. [Pageheading: LIFE PEERAGES] _Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._ BALMORAL, _19th September 1855_. The Queen has to thank Lord Palmerston for his letter of the 16th. The want of Law Lords in the Upper House has often been complained of, and the Queen has long been of opinion that in order to remedy the same without adding permanently to the Peerage, the Crown ought to use its prerogative in creating Peers for life only. Lord Lansdowne coincided with this view, and Lord John Russell actually proposed a "Life Peerage" to Dr. Lushington, who declined it, however, from a dislike to become the first of the kind. Mr Pemberton Leigh has _twice_ declined a Peerage, but the Queen can have no objection to its being offered to him again.[81]... [Footnote 81: See _ante_, vol. ii., 25th January, 1851, note 1.] _Viscount Palmerston to Queen Victoria._ PICCADILLY, _20th September 1855_. Viscount Palmerston presents his humble duty to your
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184  
185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Palmerston
 

Viscount

 

Peerage

 

Majesty

 
proposed
 

Austrians

 
demand
 

opinion

 
September
 
Victoria

Allies

 

Government

 

declined

 

January

 

PICCADILLY

 
letter
 
humble
 

deserving

 

consideration

 
opinions

appears

 

presents

 

BALMORAL

 

PEERAGES

 

sincerely

 

GRANVILLE

 

Pageheading

 

Footnote

 
Lansdowne
 
Pemberton

creating

 
coincided
 

Russell

 

Lushington

 

dislike

 

prerogative

 

remedy

 
complained
 

objection

 
offered

adding

 

permanently

 

Russia

 
incline
 
distrust
 

Austria

 

disposition

 

expect

 

comply

 

consented