his book--THE
END."

[274] I borrow this language from the Bishop of Manchester, who, on the
third day after Dickens's death, in the Abbey where he was so soon to be
laid, closed a plea for the toleration of differences of opinion where
the foundations of religious truth are accepted, with these words. "It
will not be out of harmony with the line of thought we have been
pursuing--certainly it will be in keeping with the associations of this
place, dear to Englishmen, not only as one of the proudest Christian
temples, but as containing the memorials of so many who by their genius
in arts, or arms, or statesmanship, or literature, have made England
what she is--if in the simplest and briefest words I allude to that sad
and unexpected death which has robbed English literature of one of its
highest living ornaments, and the news of which, two mornings ago, must
have made every household in England feel as though they had lost a
personal friend. He has been called in one notice an apostle of the
people. I suppose it is meant that he had a mission, but in a style and
fashion of his own; a gospel, a cheery, joyous, gladsome message, which
the people understood, and by which they could hardly help being
bettered; for it was the gospel of kindliness, of brotherly love, of
sympathy in the widest sense of the word. I am sure I have felt in
myself the healthful spirit of his teaching. Possibly we might not have
been able to subscribe to the same creed in relation to God, but I think
we should have subscribed to the same creed in relation to man. He who
has taught us our duty to our fellow men better than we knew it before,
who knew so well to weep with them that wept, and to rejoice with them
that rejoiced, who has shown forth in all his knowledge of the dark
corners of the earth how much sunshine may rest upon the lowliest lot,
who had such evident sympathy with suffering, and such a natural
instinct of purity that there is scarcely a page of the thousands he has
written which might not be put into the hands of a little child, must be
regarded by those who recognise the diversity of the gifts of the spirit
as a teacher sent from God. He would have been welcomed as a
fellow-labourer in the common interests of humanity by Him who asked the
question 'If a man love not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he
love God whom he hath not seen?'"

CHAPTER XV.

AMERICA REVISITED: NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 1867.

1867.

In