FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303  
304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   >>   >|  
eus nor Tertullian a discussion of the relation of the Scriptures to the rule of faith. From the way in which they appeal to both we can deduce a series of important problems, which, however, the Fathers themselves did not formulate and consequently did not answer.[519] _The doctrine of God_ was fixed by the old Catholic Fathers for the Christendom of succeeding centuries, and in fact both the methodic directions for forming the idea of God and their results remained unchanged. With respect to the former they occupy a middle position between the renunciation of all knowledge--for God is not abyss and silence--and the attempt to fathom the depths of the Godhead.[520] Tertullian, influenced by the Stoics, strongly emphasised the possibility of attaining a knowledge of God. Irenaeus, following out an idea which seems to anticipate the mysticism of later theologians, made love a preliminary condition of knowledge and plainly acknowledged it as the principle of knowledge.[521] God can be known from revelation,[522] because he has really revealed himself, that is, both by the creation and the word of revelation. Irenaeus also taught that a sufficient knowledge of God, as the creator and guide, can be obtained from the creation, and indeed this knowledge always continues, so that all men are without excuse.[523] In this case the prophets, the Lord himself, the Apostles, and the Church teach no more and nothing else than what must be already plain to the natural consciousness. Irenaeus certainly did not succeed in reconciling this proposition with his former assertion that the knowledge of God springs from love resting on revelation. Irenaeus also starts, as Apologist and Antignostic, with the God who is the First Cause. Every God who is not that is a phantom;[524] and every sublime religious state of mind which does not include the feeling of dependence upon God as the Creator is a deception. It is the extremest blasphemy to degrade God the Creator, and it is the most frightful machination of the devil that has produced the _blasphemia creatoris_.[525] Like the Apologists, the early Catholic Fathers confess that the doctrine of God the Creator is the first and most important of the main articles of Christian faith;[526] the belief in his oneness as well as his absoluteness is the main point.[527] God is all light, all understanding, all Logos, all active spirit;[528] everything anthropopathic and anthropomorphic is to be conc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303  
304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

knowledge

 

Irenaeus

 

Fathers

 

revelation

 

Creator

 

Catholic

 

creation

 
Tertullian
 

doctrine

 

important


Apologist

 

starts

 
resting
 
relation
 
assertion
 
springs
 

Antignostic

 

sublime

 

religious

 

phantom


Scriptures

 

discussion

 

succeed

 
Church
 

Apostles

 
prophets
 
consciousness
 

reconciling

 

natural

 

proposition


include

 

oneness

 

absoluteness

 
belief
 

articles

 

Christian

 
anthropopathic
 

anthropomorphic

 

spirit

 
understanding

active
 

confess

 

extremest

 

blasphemy

 

degrade

 

deception

 

feeling

 

dependence

 

frightful

 

Apologists