FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>  
took new heart, lived and again flourished. At another time, I transplanted several thousand Montana pines, about thirty or forty of which came within the branch limits of a medium size butternut tree. Within a year, these thirty or more trees had turned brown and were completely dead, while those immediately outside the branch area were dwarfed and not at all thrifty. The trees farther from the butternut were unaffected and grew consistently well. A similar condition, although not to the same degree, developed under a white oak where more Mugho pines were growing. Another instance occurred when a planting of several thousand Colorado blue spruce were lined out and fell within the area affected by two butternut trees. The spruce were all dead within a few months. Many people have observed the detrimental effect of trees of the walnut family on alfalfa, tomatoes and potatoes, resulting in wilting and dying. It is the root systems of the walnut which are responsible for this damage. Apparently, there is some chemical elaborated near the surface of the roots, and sensitive plants, whose roots come in contact with either roots or ground containing this factor, are injured and sometimes killed by it. One must therefore be very cautious about trusting these trees as protectors of many of the ornamental and garden plants. I am certain, from my own observations, that their influence on evergreens is strongly antagonistic. On another basis is the association between catalpas and chestnut trees growing adjacent to one another. Constructive symbiosis apparently develops when a young chestnut tree is planted within the radius of the root system of a catalpa. The latter very definitely influences the chestnut tree to grow more vigorously than it otherwise would. I have recorded my observations of these antagonisms and friendships between trees and plants to show that they are a reality which should be taken into consideration in grouping and transplanting. Such warnings are infrequent because some people may mistake them as condemnations of certain favorite trees. I do not intend them as such, for these plants are often valuable and worthwhile. This ability which they have developed through the many years of their existence is a guarantee of the sturdiness and strength of their family and species, not at all a quality to be condemned. CONCLUSION If I had written this book twenty years ago, I would have prophesie
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>  



Top keywords:

plants

 

chestnut

 

butternut

 

people

 

walnut

 

family

 

spruce

 

developed

 

growing

 
observations

branch

 
thirty
 
thousand
 

adjacent

 
worthwhile
 

catalpas

 

association

 

Constructive

 
symbiosis
 

planted


radius

 

valuable

 

condemned

 
apparently
 
develops
 

CONCLUSION

 

antagonistic

 

ornamental

 

garden

 

protectors


prophesie

 
trusting
 

twenty

 

influence

 

evergreens

 

strongly

 

written

 

system

 
catalpa
 

grouping


transplanting
 
existence
 

consideration

 

warnings

 

condemnations

 

intend

 

mistake

 
infrequent
 

reality

 
species