FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120  
121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   >>   >|  
ts execution odious."[47] John Randolph argued against even fine and imprisonment, "on the ground that such an excessive penalty could not, in such case, be constitutionally imposed by a Government possessed of the limited powers of the Government of the United States."[48] The bill as passed punished infractions as follows:-- For equipping a slaver, a fine of $20,000 and forfeiture of the ship. For transporting Negroes, a fine of $5000 and forfeiture of the ship and Negroes. For transporting and selling Negroes, a fine of $1000 to $10,000, imprisonment from 5 to 10 years, and forfeiture of the ship and Negroes. For knowingly buying illegally imported Negroes, a fine of $800 for each Negro, and forfeiture. 58. ~The Third Question: How shall the Interstate Coastwise Slave-Trade be protected?~ The first proposition was to prohibit the coastwise slave-trade altogether,[49] but an amendment reported to the House allowed it "in any vessel or species of craft whatever." It is probable that the first proposition would have prevailed, had it not been for the vehement opposition of Randolph and Early.[50] They probably foresaw the value which Virginia would derive from this trade in the future, and consequently Randolph violently declared that if the amendment did not prevail, "the Southern people would set the law at defiance. He would begin the example." He maintained that by the first proposition "the proprietor of sacred and chartered rights is prevented the Constitutional use of his property."[51] The Conference Committee finally arranged a compromise, forbidding the coastwise trade for purposes of sale in vessels under forty tons.[52] This did not suit Early, who declared that the law with this provision "would not prevent the introduction of a single slave."[53] Randolph, too, would "rather lose the bill, he had rather lose all the bills of the session, he had rather lose every bill passed since the establishment of the Government, than agree to the provision contained in this slave bill."[54] He predicted the severance of the slave and the free States, if disunion should ever come. Congress was, however, weary with the dragging of the bill, and it passed both Houses with the compromise provision. Randolph was so dissatisfied that he had a committee appointed the next day, and introduced an amendatory bill. Both this bill and another similar one, introduced at the next se
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120  
121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Negroes

 

Randolph

 

forfeiture

 

passed

 

proposition

 

provision

 
Government
 

introduced

 

coastwise

 

amendment


compromise
 

declared

 

imprisonment

 

transporting

 

States

 

Constitutional

 

property

 

Conference

 
finally
 

purposes


similar

 
forbidding
 

disunion

 

prevented

 

arranged

 
Committee
 

chartered

 
defiance
 

people

 

Congress


vessels

 

Houses

 

sacred

 

proprietor

 

maintained

 

rights

 

session

 
Southern
 

appointed

 

predicted


contained
 
committee
 

establishment

 
single
 
introduction
 
dissatisfied
 

amendatory

 

severance

 

prevent

 

dragging