20. So in the MS. The syntax is confused, but the
sense is clear.
Page 92, ll. 21, 22. Gilbert Sheldon (1598-1677), Archbishop of
Canterbury, 1663; Chancellor of the University of Oxford, and builder
of the Sheldonian Theatre there.
George Morley (1597-1684), Bishop of Worcester, 1660.
Henry Hammond (1605-60), chaplain to Charles I.
Clarendon has given short characters of Sheldon and Morley in his
_Life_. For his characters of Earle and Chillingworth, see Nos. 50 and
52.
Page 94, l. 11. See note p. 74, l. 14.
Page 95, l. 3. Cf. p. 78, l. 17.
l. 17. It is notable that Clarendon nowhere suggests that Falkland was
also a poet. Cowley gives his verses the highest praise in his address
to him on the Northern Expedition (see p. 83, l. 2, note); and they
won him a place in Suckling's _Sessions of the Poets_:
He was of late so gone with Divinity
That he had almost forgot his Poetry,
Though to say the truth (and _Apollo_ did know it)
He might have been both his Priest and his Poet.
His poems were collected and edited by A.B. Grosart in 1871.
23.
Clarendon, MS. Life, p. 55; _Life_, ed. 1759, p. 24.
This very pleasing portrait of Godolphin serves as a pendant to the
longer and more elaborate description of his friend. Clarendon wrote
also a shorter character of him in the _History_ (vol. ii, pp. 457-8).
Page 96, l. 2. _so very small a body_. He is the 'little Cid' (i.e.
Sidney) of Suckling's _Sessions of the Poets_.
PAGE 97, l. 1. He was member for Helston from 1628 to 1643.
l. 6. In the character in the _History_ Clarendon says that he left
'the ignominy of his death upon a place which could never otherwise
have had a mention to the world'. The place was Chagford.
24.
Clarendon, MS. Life, pp. 69-70; _History_, Bk. I, ed. 1702, vol. i,
pp. 69-73; ed. Macray, vol. i, pp. 119-25.
The three characters of Laud here given supplement each other. They
convey the same idea of the man.
Page 97, l. 20. George Abbott (1562-1633), Archbishop of Canterbury,
1611. In the preceding paragraph Clarendon had written an unfavourable
character of him. He 'considered Christian religion no otherwise than
as it abhorred and reviled Popery, and valued those men most who did
that most furiously': 'if men prudently forbore a public reviling
and railing at the hierarchy and ecclesiastical government, let their
opinions and private practice be what it would, they were not only
secure from any inquisiti
|