FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   >>  
Eddington and Cottingham, those of the second, Crommelin and Davidson. The conditions were especially favorable, for a very large number of bright stars were shown on the photographic plate; the observers at Sobral being particularly lucky in having good weather. The total eclipse lasted five minutes, during four of which it was perfectly clear, so that good photographs could be taken. In the report issued regarding the results the following figures, which are the average of the measurements made from the seven plates, are given for the displacements of seven stars: 1''.02, 0''.92, 0''.84, 0''.58, 0''.54, 0''.36, 0''.24, whereas, according to the theory, the displacements should have amounted to: 0''.88, 0''.80, 0''.75, 0''.40, 0''.52, 0''.33, 0''.20. If we consider that, according to the theory the displacements must be in inverse ratio to the distance from the centre of the sun, then we may deduce from each observed displacement how great the sideways movement for a star at the edge of the sun should have been. As the most probable result, therefore, the number 1''.98 was found from all the observations together. As the last of the displacements given above--i.e., 0''.24 is about one-eighth of this, we may say that the influence of the attraction of the sun upon light made itself felt upon the ray at a distance eight times removed from its centre. The displacements calculated according to the theory are, just because of the way in which they are calculated, in inverse proportion to the distance to the centre. Now that the observed deviations also accord with the same rule, it follows that they are surely proportionate with the calculated displacements. The proportion of the first and the last observed sidewise movements is 4.2, and that of the two most extreme of the calculated numbers is 4.4. This result is of importance, because thereby the theory is excluded, or at least made extremely improbable, that the phenomenon of refraction is to be ascribed to, a ring of vapor surrounding the sun for a great distance. Indeed, such a refraction should cause a deviation in the observed direction, and, in order to produce the displacement of one of the stars under observation itself a slight proximity of the vapor ring should be sufficient, but we have every reason to expect that if it were merely a question of a mass of gas around the sun the diminishing effect accompanying a removal from the sun should manifest it
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   >>  



Top keywords:

displacements

 

calculated

 

observed

 

theory

 

distance

 

centre

 
displacement
 

inverse

 

proportion

 
number

refraction

 

result

 

influence

 

attraction

 
removed
 

accord

 
deviations
 

eighth

 

sufficient

 

proximity


reason
 

slight

 

observation

 

direction

 

produce

 
expect
 

effect

 

accompanying

 

removal

 

manifest


diminishing

 

question

 

deviation

 

extreme

 

numbers

 
movements
 

surely

 
proportionate
 

sidewise

 

importance


ascribed

 
surrounding
 

Indeed

 

phenomenon

 

improbable

 

excluded

 
extremely
 

deduce

 
minutes
 
lasted