FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95  
96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>   >|  
er clearness, I shall not draw the bricks in the shaft, nor the flat stone which carries them, though the reader is to suppose them remaining as drawn in Fig. XI.; but I shall only draw the shaft and its two essential members of base, Xb and Yb, as explained at p. 65, above: and now, expressing the rounding of these numbers on _a_ somewhat larger scale, we have the profile _a_, Fig. XII.; _b_, the perspective appearance of such a base seen from above; and _c_, the plan of it. Sec. XI. Now I am quite sure the reader is not satisfied of the stability of this form as it is seen at _b_; nor would he ever be so with the main contour of a circular base. Observe, we have taken some trouble to reduce the member Yb into this round form, and all that we have gained by so doing, is this unsatisfactory and unstable look of the base; of which the chief reason is, that a circle, unless enclosed by right lines, has never an appearance of fixture, or definite place,[37]--we suspect it of motion, like an orb of heaven; and the second is, that the whole base, considered as the foot of the shaft, has no grasp nor hold: it is a club-foot, and looks too blunt for the limb,--it wants at least expansion, if not division. [Illustration: Fig. XII.] Sec. XII. Suppose, then, instead of taking so much trouble with the member Yb, we save time and labor, and leave it a square block. Xb must, however, evidently follow the pillar, as its condition is that it slope to the very base of the wall veil, and of whatever the wall veil becomes. So the corners of Yb will project beyond the circle of Xb, and we shall have (Fig. XII.) the profile _d_, the perspective appearance _e_, and the plan _f_. I am quite sure the reader likes _e_ much better than he did _b_. The circle is now placed, and we are not afraid of its rolling away. The foot has greater expansion, and we have saved labor besides, with little loss of space, for the interval between the bases is just as great as it was before,--we have only filled up the corners of the squares. But is it not possible to mend the form still further? There is surely still an appearance of separation between Xb and Yb, as if the one might slip off the other. The foot is expanded enough; but it needs some expression of grasp as well. It has no toes. Suppose we were to put a spur or prop to Xb at each corner, so as to hold it fast in the centre of Yb. We will do this in the simplest possible form. We will have t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95  
96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

appearance

 

circle

 

reader

 

corners

 

perspective

 

trouble

 

member

 
profile
 

expansion

 

Suppose


evidently
 

rolling

 

afraid

 

follow

 
square
 
project
 

condition

 

pillar

 

expression

 

expanded


centre

 

simplest

 

corner

 

interval

 
greater
 

surely

 

separation

 
filled
 

squares

 

satisfied


larger

 

stability

 

Observe

 

reduce

 

circular

 

contour

 

numbers

 

carries

 
suppose
 

clearness


bricks

 

remaining

 

expressing

 

rounding

 

explained

 

essential

 

members

 

considered

 
heaven
 

taking