FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   >>  
an give no particulars of dress, &c., which might help to determine its age; nor could my informant, though he perfectly well remembered the subject represented. He told me that he had often mentioned it to people likely to know of the existence of such a legend, but could never gain any information respecting it. C. J. E. King's Col. Cambridge, May 9. 1851. _King of Nineveh burns himself in his Palace_.--In a review of Mr. Layard's work on Nineveh (_Quarterly_, vol. lxxxiv. p. 140.) I find the following statement: "The act of Sardanapalus in making his palace his own funeral pyre and burning himself upon it, is also attributed to the king who was overthrown by Cyaxares." May I ask where the authority for this statement is to be found? X. Z. _Butchers not Jurymen_.-- "As the law does think it fit No butchers shall on juries sit."--Butler's _Ghost_, cant. ii. The vulgar error expressed in these lines is not extinct, even at the present day. The only explanation I have seen of its origin is given in Barrington's _Observations on the more Ancient Statutes_, p. 474., on 3 Hen. VIII., where, after referring in the text to a statute by which surgeons were exempted from attendance on juries, he adds in a note: "It may perhaps be thought singular to suppose that this exemption from serving on juries is the foundation of the vulgar error, that a surgeon or butcher from the barbarity of their business may be challenged as jurors." Sir H. Spelman, in his _Answer to an Apology for Archbishop Abbott_, says,-- "In our law, those that were exercised in slaughter of beasts, were not received to be triers of the life of a man."--_Posth. Works_, p. 112.; _St. Trials_, vol. ii. p. 1171. So learned a man as Spelman must, I think, have had some ground for this statement, and could scarcely be repeating a vulgar error taking its rise from a statute then hardly more than a hundred years old. I hope some of your readers will be able to give a more satisfactory explanation than Barrington's. E. S. T. T. _Redwing's Nest_.--I trust you will excuse my asking, if any of your correspondents have found the nest of the redwing? for I lately discovered what I consider as the egg of this bird in a nest containing four blackbirds' eggs. The egg answers exactly the description given of that of the redwing thrush, both in Bewick and Wood's _British Song Birds;_ being bluish-gre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   >>  



Top keywords:

vulgar

 

juries

 

statement

 

Nineveh

 

Spelman

 

redwing

 
explanation
 

statute

 
Barrington
 
slaughter

attendance

 
exempted
 
beasts
 

exercised

 
thought
 

exemption

 
barbarity
 

business

 
received
 

challenged


jurors

 
butcher
 

Archbishop

 

suppose

 

Abbott

 

Apology

 

Answer

 

surgeon

 

foundation

 

serving


singular

 

blackbirds

 

discovered

 
excuse
 
correspondents
 

answers

 

bluish

 

British

 

description

 

thrush


Bewick

 

learned

 
ground
 

scarcely

 
Trials
 
repeating
 

taking

 
satisfactory
 
Redwing
 

readers