FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  
orks, highly glazed as to technical surface, pretty as to sentiment, Bach seen through the lorgnette of a refined, thin, narrow nature. And here are the Chopin compositions." The murder is out--I have jumped from Bach and Beethoven to Chopin without a twinge of my critical conscience. Why? I hardly know why, except that I was thinking of that mythical desert island and the usual idiotic question: What composers would you select if you were to be marooned on a South Sea Island?--you know the style of question and, alas! the style of answer. You may also guess the composers of my selection. And the least of the three in the last group above named is not Chopin--Chopin, who, as a piano composer pure and simple, still ranks his predecessors, his contemporaries, his successors. I am sure that the brilliant Mr. Finck, the erudite Mr. Krehbiel, the witty Mr. Henderson, the judicial Mr. Aldrich, the phenomenal Philip Hale, have told us and will tell us all about Chopin's life, his poetry, his technical prowess, his capacity as a pedagogue, his reforms, his striking use of dance forms. Let me contribute my humble and dusty mite; let me speak of a Chopin, of the Chopin, of a Chopin--pardon my tedious manner of address--who has most appealed to me since my taste has been clarified by long experience. I know that it is customary to swoon over Chopin's languorous muse, to counterfeit critical raptures when his name is mentioned. For this reason I dislike exegetical comments on his music. Lives of Chopin from Liszt to Niecks, Huneker, Hadow, and the rest are either too much given over to dry-as-dust or to rhapsody. I am a teacher of the pianoforte, that good old keyboard which I know will outlive all its mechanical imitators. I have assured you of this fact about fifteen years ago, and I expect to hammer away at it for the next fifteen years if my health and your amiability endure. The Chopin music is written for the piano--a truism!--so why in writing of it are not critics practical? It is the practical Chopin I am interested in nowadays, not the poetic--for the latter quality will always take care of itself. Primarily among the practical considerations of the Chopin music is the patent fact that only a certain section of his music is studied in private and played in public. And a very limited section it is, as those who teach or frequent piano recitals are able to testify. Why should the _D-flat Valse_, _E-flat_ and _G minor Noc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Chopin
 

practical

 

composers

 

technical

 

fifteen

 

question

 
critical
 

section

 

teacher

 

keyboard


pianoforte

 

experience

 

raptures

 

outlive

 
mentioned
 

languorous

 

rhapsody

 

Huneker

 

Niecks

 

mechanical


customary
 

counterfeit

 

reason

 
dislike
 
comments
 

exegetical

 

written

 

played

 

private

 

public


limited

 

studied

 

Primarily

 

considerations

 

patent

 

frequent

 

recitals

 
testify
 

health

 

amiability


endure

 

assured

 
expect
 
hammer
 

truism

 

poetic

 
quality
 

nowadays

 
interested
 

writing